Preferences for Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Comparison of the Patient Perspective, the General Population Perspective, and a Population at Risk for Prostate Cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Gries, Katharine S. [1 ]
Regier, Dean A. [2 ,3 ]
Ramsey, Scott D. [4 ]
Patrick, Donald L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Evidera, Seattle, WA USA
[2] BC Canc Agcy Res Ctr, Canadian Ctr Appl Res Canc Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
outcomes; perspective; preference values; prostate cancer; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH STATES; UTILITY; VALUES; MULTIATTRIBUTE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTEM; ILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To collect disease-specific and generic preference values for three populations. Methods: Prostate cancer-specific health states were developed with attributes that varied across five health domains: sexual function, urinary function, bowel function, pain, and fear of the future. Men with prostate cancer, men at risk for prostate cancer, and a sample of the general population assigned value to 18 disease specific health states using standard gamble (SG) methodology. Study participants also completed the Health Utilities Index (HUI) to obtain generic, community-based preference values to capture their current health rating. Results: A total of 136 participants were enrolled (n = 43 prostate cancer; n = 40 at risk for prostate cancer; n = 49 general population). Mean HUI mark 3 current health ratings: men with prostate cancer 0.75 +/- 0.260; men at risk for prostate cancer 0.77 +/- 0.238; general population 0.84 +/- 0.178. Mean SG preference values ranged from 0.46 to 0.85 among men with prostate cancer, 0.37 to 0.75 among men at risk for prostate cancer, and 0.32 to 0.81 among the general population group. Conclusions: In general, preference values for disease-specific health states using the patient perspective were higher than those for the general population. Generic preference values calculated from the HUI were higher than disease-specific preference values calculated from the SG. The higher values calculated from the HUI, from all three perspectives, indicate that a generic measure may not be sensitive enough to capture the disutility of prostate cancer symptoms, specifically sexual dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, and bowel dysfunction, which are being directly measured in the disease specific health states.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 225
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient Preferences and Urologist Judgments on Prostate Cancer Therapy in Japan
    Nakayama, Masahiko
    Kobayashi, Hisanori
    Okazaki, Masateru
    Imanaka, Keiichiro
    Yoshizawa, Kazutake
    Mahlich, Joerg
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2018, 12 (04) : 1094 - 1101
  • [32] XRCC1 and XPD polymorphisms: clinical outcomes and risk of prostate cancer in Bangladeshi population
    Ahmed, Nafisa
    Islam, Md. Ariful
    Hossain, M. Mahboob
    Kabir, Yearul
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 51 (01)
  • [33] Inflammation in the etiology of prostate cancer: An epidemiologic perspective
    Sutcliffe, Siobhan
    Platz, Elizabeth A.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2007, 25 (03) : 242 - 249
  • [34] Can Western Based Online Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators Be Used to Predict Prostate Cancer after Prostate Biopsy for the Korean Population?
    Lee, Dong Hoon
    Jung, Ha Bum
    Park, Jae Won
    Kim, Kyu Hyun
    Kim, Jongchan
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Chung, Byung Ha
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (03) : 665 - 671
  • [35] Interleukin-6 Polymorphism and Prostate Cancer Risk in Population of Eastern Croatia
    Mandic, Sanja
    Sudarevic, Bojan
    Marczi, Saska
    Horvat, Vesna
    Cosic, Ivan
    Mihaljevic, Slobodan
    Milicevic, Nevenka
    Simunovic, Dalibor
    Galic, Josip
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2013, 37 (03) : 907 - 911
  • [36] Defining aggressive prostate cancer: a geospatial perspective
    Daniel Wiese
    Tesla D. DuBois
    Kristen A. Sorice
    Carolyn Y. Fang
    Camille Ragin
    Mary B. Daly
    Adam C. Reese
    Kevin A. Henry
    Shannon M. Lynch
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [37] Defining aggressive prostate cancer: a geospatial perspective
    Wiese, Daniel
    DuBois, Tesla D.
    Sorice, Kristen A.
    Fang, Carolyn Y. Y.
    Ragin, Camille
    Daly, Mary B.
    Reese, Adam C.
    Henry, Kevin A.
    Lynch, Shannon M.
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [38] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a legal perspective
    Venderbos, Lionne D. F.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    de Hoogh, August N. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL UROLOGY, 2014, 2 (04): : 323 - 331
  • [39] Quality of life in a population of Polish patients with prostate cancer
    Kutwin, Piotr
    Konecki, Tomasz
    Jablonowski, Zbigniew
    Wolski, Zbigniew
    Sosnowski, Marek
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [40] Precision medicine for prostate cancer: An international perspective
    Hamid, Anis A.
    Sweeney, Christopher J.
    Hovens, Christopher
    Corcoran, Niall
    Azad, Arun A.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (12) : 392 - 401