Preferences for Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Comparison of the Patient Perspective, the General Population Perspective, and a Population at Risk for Prostate Cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Gries, Katharine S. [1 ]
Regier, Dean A. [2 ,3 ]
Ramsey, Scott D. [4 ]
Patrick, Donald L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Evidera, Seattle, WA USA
[2] BC Canc Agcy Res Ctr, Canadian Ctr Appl Res Canc Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
outcomes; perspective; preference values; prostate cancer; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH STATES; UTILITY; VALUES; MULTIATTRIBUTE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTEM; ILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To collect disease-specific and generic preference values for three populations. Methods: Prostate cancer-specific health states were developed with attributes that varied across five health domains: sexual function, urinary function, bowel function, pain, and fear of the future. Men with prostate cancer, men at risk for prostate cancer, and a sample of the general population assigned value to 18 disease specific health states using standard gamble (SG) methodology. Study participants also completed the Health Utilities Index (HUI) to obtain generic, community-based preference values to capture their current health rating. Results: A total of 136 participants were enrolled (n = 43 prostate cancer; n = 40 at risk for prostate cancer; n = 49 general population). Mean HUI mark 3 current health ratings: men with prostate cancer 0.75 +/- 0.260; men at risk for prostate cancer 0.77 +/- 0.238; general population 0.84 +/- 0.178. Mean SG preference values ranged from 0.46 to 0.85 among men with prostate cancer, 0.37 to 0.75 among men at risk for prostate cancer, and 0.32 to 0.81 among the general population group. Conclusions: In general, preference values for disease-specific health states using the patient perspective were higher than those for the general population. Generic preference values calculated from the HUI were higher than disease-specific preference values calculated from the SG. The higher values calculated from the HUI, from all three perspectives, indicate that a generic measure may not be sensitive enough to capture the disutility of prostate cancer symptoms, specifically sexual dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, and bowel dysfunction, which are being directly measured in the disease specific health states.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 225
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prostate Cancer From a Sex and Gender Perspective: A Review
    Muermann, Martin M.
    Wassersug, Richard J.
    SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2022, 10 (01) : 142 - 154
  • [22] Prospective development of a prostate cancer risk calculator in a racially diverse population: The Kaiser Permanente Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator
    Presti, Joseph
    Alexeeff, Stacey
    Horton, Brandon
    Prausnitz, Stephanie
    Avins, Andrew L.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (11) : 847.e1 - 847.e8
  • [23] Communication preferences of patients with prostate cancer. Preferences regarding the communication of bad news of patients with prostate cancer in Germany-results of an anonymous patient survey
    Merseburger, A. S.
    Kramer, M. W.
    Scheithe, K.
    Colling, C.
    UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (10): : 1339 - 1345
  • [24] Statin Use in Relation to Prostate Cancer Outcomes in a Population-based Patient Cohort Study
    Geybels, Milan S.
    Wright, Jonathan L.
    Holt, Sarah K.
    Kolb, Suzanne
    Feng, Ziding
    Stanford, Janet L.
    PROSTATE, 2013, 73 (11) : 1214 - 1222
  • [25] Future perspective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer
    O'Connor, Luke P.
    Ramedani, Shayann
    Daneshvar, Michael
    George, Arvin K.
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 8 (04) : 354 - 361
  • [26] Risk of prostate cancer and family history of cancer: a population based study in China
    Bai, Y
    Gao, YT
    Deng, J
    Sesterhenn, IA
    Fraumeni, JF
    Hsing, AW
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2005, 8 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [27] A population model of prostate cancer incidence
    Tsodikov, A.
    Szabo, A.
    Wegelin, J.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (16) : 2846 - 2866
  • [28] Predictors of Patient Preferences and Treatment Choices for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Sommers, Benjamin D.
    Beard, Clair J.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Kaplan, Irving
    Richie, Jerome R.
    Zeckhauser, Richard J.
    CANCER, 2008, 113 (08) : 2058 - 2067
  • [29] Factors that influence patient preferences for prostate cancer management options: a systematic review
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Mishra, Mark V.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2015, 9 : 899 - 911
  • [30] The Association of Prostate Cancer and Urinary Tract Infections: A New Perspective of Prostate Cancer Pathogenesis
    Pan, Szu-Ying
    Chen, Wen-Chi
    Huang, Chi-Ping
    Hsu, Chung Y.
    Chang, Yi-Huei
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (03):