Preferences for Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Comparison of the Patient Perspective, the General Population Perspective, and a Population at Risk for Prostate Cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Gries, Katharine S. [1 ]
Regier, Dean A. [2 ,3 ]
Ramsey, Scott D. [4 ]
Patrick, Donald L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Evidera, Seattle, WA USA
[2] BC Canc Agcy Res Ctr, Canadian Ctr Appl Res Canc Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
outcomes; perspective; preference values; prostate cancer; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH STATES; UTILITY; VALUES; MULTIATTRIBUTE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTEM; ILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To collect disease-specific and generic preference values for three populations. Methods: Prostate cancer-specific health states were developed with attributes that varied across five health domains: sexual function, urinary function, bowel function, pain, and fear of the future. Men with prostate cancer, men at risk for prostate cancer, and a sample of the general population assigned value to 18 disease specific health states using standard gamble (SG) methodology. Study participants also completed the Health Utilities Index (HUI) to obtain generic, community-based preference values to capture their current health rating. Results: A total of 136 participants were enrolled (n = 43 prostate cancer; n = 40 at risk for prostate cancer; n = 49 general population). Mean HUI mark 3 current health ratings: men with prostate cancer 0.75 +/- 0.260; men at risk for prostate cancer 0.77 +/- 0.238; general population 0.84 +/- 0.178. Mean SG preference values ranged from 0.46 to 0.85 among men with prostate cancer, 0.37 to 0.75 among men at risk for prostate cancer, and 0.32 to 0.81 among the general population group. Conclusions: In general, preference values for disease-specific health states using the patient perspective were higher than those for the general population. Generic preference values calculated from the HUI were higher than disease-specific preference values calculated from the SG. The higher values calculated from the HUI, from all three perspectives, indicate that a generic measure may not be sensitive enough to capture the disutility of prostate cancer symptoms, specifically sexual dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, and bowel dysfunction, which are being directly measured in the disease specific health states.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 225
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Expressive disclosure and health outcomes in a prostate cancer population
    Rosenberg, HJ
    Rosenberg, SD
    Ernstoff, MS
    Wolford, GL
    Amdur, RJ
    Elshamy, MR
    Bauer-Wu, SM
    Ahles, TA
    Pennebaker, JW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (01) : 37 - 53
  • [2] Health-related quality of life of Chinese patients with prostate cancer in comparison to general population and other cancer populations
    Choi, Edmond P. H.
    Wong, Carlos K. H.
    Tsu, James H. L.
    Chin, W. Y.
    Kung, Kenny
    Wong, Charles K. W.
    Yiu, M. K.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (04) : 1849 - 1856
  • [3] Patient and General Population Preferences Regarding the Benefits and Harms of Treatment for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Menges, Dominik
    Piatti, Michela C.
    Omlin, Aurelius
    Cathomas, Richard
    Benamran, Daniel
    Fischer, Stefanie
    Iselin, Christophe
    Kung, Marc
    Lorch, Anja
    Prause, Lukas
    Rothermundt, Christian
    Stern, Alix O'Meara
    Zihler, Deborah
    Lippuner, Max
    Braun, Julia
    Cerny, Thomas
    Puhan, Milo A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 51 : 26 - 38
  • [4] Prostate-specific symptoms of prostate cancer in a German general population
    Bestmann, B.
    Loetters, C.
    Diemer, T.
    Weidner, W.
    Kuechler, T.
    Rohde, V.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2007, 10 (01) : 52 - 59
  • [5] Prostate-specific symptoms of prostate cancer in a German general population
    B Bestmann
    C Loetters
    T Diemer
    W Weidner
    T Küchler
    V Rohde
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2007, 10 : 52 - 59
  • [6] A Perspective of Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Silvestri, Ida
    Cattarino, Susanna
    Giantulli, Sabrina
    Nazzari, Cristina
    Collalti, Giulia
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    CANCERS, 2016, 8 (07)
  • [7] Patient Perspective on Watchful Waiting/Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Xu, Jinping
    Neale, Anne Victoria
    Dailey, Rhonda K.
    Eggly, Susan
    Schwartz, Kendra L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (06) : 763 - 770
  • [8] Management of Prostate Cancer with Systemic Therapy: A Prostate Cancer Unit Perspective
    Campodonico, Fabio
    Ennas, Marco
    Zanardi, Silvia
    Zigoura, Ekaterini
    Piccardo, Arnoldo
    Foppiani, Luca
    Schiavone, Concetta
    Squillace, Lino
    Benelli, Andrea
    De Censi, Andrea
    Grillo-Ruggieri, Filippo
    Introini, Carlo
    CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS, 2021, 21 (02) : 107 - 116
  • [9] Health-related quality of life of Chinese patients with prostate cancer in comparison to general population and other cancer populations
    Edmond P. H. Choi
    Carlos K. H. Wong
    James H. L. Tsu
    W. Y. Chin
    Kenny Kung
    Charles K. W. Wong
    M. K. Yiu
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 1849 - 1856
  • [10] Prostate cancer risk assessment tools in an unscreened population
    Lundon, D. J.
    Kelly, B. D.
    Foley, R.
    Loeb, S.
    Fitzpatrick, J. M.
    Watson, R. W. G.
    Rogers, E.
    Durkan, G. C.
    Walsh, K.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (06) : 827 - 832