Influence of quality of recovery on patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery: a prospective observational cohort study

被引:37
作者
Berning, V. [1 ]
Laupheimer, M. [2 ]
Nubling, M. [3 ]
Heidegger, T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Spitalreg Rheintal Werdenberg Sarganserland, Dept Anaesthesia Intens Care & Resuscitat, Grabs, Switzerland
[2] Hosp Memmingen, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care Med & Pain Therapy, Memmingen, Germany
[3] Empir Consulting, GEB mbH, Denzlingen, Germany
[4] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Quality measures: patient care; COMPOSITE END-POINTS; POSTOPERATIVE QUALITY; SURROGATE OUTCOMES; TRIALS; CARE; MEANINGFUL; SCALE;
D O I
10.1111/anae.13906
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Patient satisfaction and quality of recovery are important measures of quality. Whether, and to what extent, patient satisfaction is influenced by quality of recovery, however, is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional influence of quality of recovery on total patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery. In this prospective cohort study, we used a validated quality of recovery questionnaire and a multi-item patient satisfaction questionnaire. Patients completed the quality of recovery questionnaire pre-operatively and 24 h postoperatively. One to two weeks after discharge, a third quality of recovery questionnaire was sent out, together with the patient satisfaction questionnaire. If no response was received after 2 weeks, a reminder containing the quality of recovery and the satisfaction questionnaire were mailed. Seven hundred and thirty-four patients were consecutively assessed for eligibility. Five hundred and seventy-nine patients completed at least one questionnaire (recruitment rate 79%). Four hundred and sixty-seven patients (81%) completed all four questionnaires. The total satisfaction score was high, with a mean (SD) of 94.6 (10.7) on a 0-100 scale. Correlation analysis between quality of recovery and total patient satisfaction showed correlations of 0.2-0.3. Testing different aspects of quality of recovery in models already containing the significant factors of patient satisfaction did not improve the model fit markedly. We conclude that quality of recovery has only a marginal additional effect on total patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1096
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Aharony L, 1993, Med Care Rev, V50, P49, DOI 10.1177/002570879305000104
  • [2] Pragmatic model of patient satisfaction in general practice: progress towards a theory
    Baker, R
    [J]. QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1997, 6 (04): : 201 - 204
  • [3] Patient-Satisfaction Measures in Anesthesia Qualitative Systematic Review
    Barnett, Sarah F.
    Alagar, Ravi K.
    Grocott, Michael P. W.
    Giannaris, Savvas
    Dick, John R.
    Moonesinghe, Suneetha Ramani
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 119 (02) : 452 - 478
  • [4] A review of the scope and measurement of postoperative quality of recovery
    Bowyer, A.
    Jakobsson, J.
    Ljungqvist, O.
    Royse, C.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 (11) : 1266 - 1278
  • [5] Postoperative recovery and outcomes - what are we measuring and for whom?
    Bowyer, A. J.
    Royse, C. F.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 : 72 - 77
  • [6] Surrogate outcomes: Meaningful not!
    Fisher, DM
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (02) : 355 - 356
  • [7] Implementation of shared decision making in anaesthesia and its influence on patient satisfaction
    Flierler, W. J.
    Nuebling, M.
    Kasper, J.
    Heidegger, T.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (07) : 713 - 722
  • [8] Composite and surrogate outcomes in randomised controlled trials - Composite end points may mislead - and regulators allow it to happen
    Freemantle, Nick
    Calvert, Mel
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7597): : 756 - 757
  • [9] Are measures of patient satisfaction hopelessly flawed?
    Haggerty, Jeannie L.
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341
  • [10] Patient-centred outcomes in clinical research:: does it really matter?
    Heidegger, T.
    Nuebling, M.
    Saal, D.
    Kreienbuehl, G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 100 (01) : 1 - 3