Comparison of compressive strength between three different plates for mandibular angle fractures fixation

被引:4
作者
Lyrio, Mariana C. Negreiros [1 ]
Monnazzi, Marcelo Silva [1 ]
De Moraes, Marcio [1 ]
Hochuli-Vieira, Eduardo [1 ]
Nunes Reis, Jose Mauricio [1 ]
Pereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] UNESP, Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Diag & Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Dent Sch Araraquara, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Bone plate; Bite force; Compressive strength; Mandibular fracture; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; MINIPLATE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The present study aims to compare three types of internal fixation for fractures of the mandibular angle. Mechanical testing was performed on replicas of polyurethane hemimandibles sectioned at the angle region to simulate a fracture and fixed with three different hardwares. Fixation devices enrolled on this survey included the grid plates with and without an intermediate bar and the method described by Champy and colleagues in 1978 and the sample consisted of 10 hemimandibles for each group. Vertical loadings were applied on each hemimandible and recorded after a vertical displacement of 3 and 5 mm. Statistical analysis was made by means of the variance analysis (ANOVA) and the Duncan test with a significance level of 5%. The Champy technique showed a statistically significant increased resistance when compared to the grid plates after vertical displacements of 3 and 5 mm. The results of this survey suggest that the Champy technique, when compared to the grid plate positioned at the middle of the mandibular bone (placement site selected for this study), is more resistant than the grid plate and that the inclusion or not of an intermediate bar to the grid plates does not improve its resistance after linear vertical loadings. (C) 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E277 / E280
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques [J].
Asprino, L ;
Consani, S ;
de Moraes, M .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 64 (03) :452-456
[2]  
Champy M, 1975, Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl, V63, P339
[3]  
Ellis E, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V28, P243, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-0020.1999.284280401.x
[4]   TREATMENT OF MANDIBULAR ANGLE FRACTURES USING 2 NONCOMPRESSION MINIPLATES [J].
ELLIS, E ;
WALKER, E .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (10) :1032-1036
[5]   TREATMENT OF MANDIBULAR ANGLE FRACTURES USING 2 2.4-MM DYNAMIC COMPRESSION PLATES [J].
ELLIS, E ;
SINN, DP .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (09) :969-973
[6]   Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using one noncompression miniplate [J].
Ellis, E ;
Walker, LR .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (07) :864-871
[7]   TREATMENT OF MANDIBULAR ANGLE FRACTURES USING THE AO RECONSTRUCTION PLATE [J].
ELLIS, E .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (03) :250-254
[8]  
Farmand M, 1996, Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir, V41, P85
[9]  
Farmand M, 1995, FACIAL PLAST SURG CL, V3, P39
[10]   Treatment of mandibular angle fractures with a matrix miniplate: A preliminary report [J].
Feledy, J ;
Caterson, EJ ;
Steger, S ;
Stal, S ;
Hollier, L .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 114 (07) :1711-1716