Risks of miscarriage or preterm delivery in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:34
|
作者
Anthoulakis, C. [1 ]
Dagklis, T. [1 ]
Mamopoulos, A. [1 ]
Athanasiadis, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 3, Hippokrat Ippokrateio Gen Hosp Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
关键词
dichorionic triamniotic pregnancy; trichorionoc triamniotic pregnancy; embryo reduction; miscarriage; preterm birth; FETAL REDUCTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; TWINS; GESTATION; CHECKLIST; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; TRENDS; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dex084
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY QUESTION: Is pregnancy outcome in triplet pregnancies improved with embryo reduction (ER) to twins compared to expectant management? SUMMARY ANSWER: In trichorionic triplet pregnancies, ER to twins reduces the risk of preterm birth (<34 weeks) without significantly increasing the risk of miscarriage (<24 weeks), whereas in dichorionic triplet pregnancies, the results are inconclusive. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Triplet pregnancies are associated with a high risk of miscarriage and preterm birth. ER can ameliorate these conditions in higher order multiple gestations but is still controversial in triplets. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review, following the PRISMA guidelines, and critically appraise ER at 8-14 weeks of gestation in both trichorionic triamniotic (TCTA) and dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) pregnancies. Selective ER to twins was compared with expectant management, focusing on the risks of miscarriage and preterm birth. The computerized database search was performed on 8 January 2017. Overall, from 25 citations of relevance, eight studies with a total of 249 DCTA and 1167 TCTA pregnancies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A comprehensive computerized systematic literature search of all English language studies between 2000 and 2016 was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews (Cochrane Database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Google Scholar. Relevant article reference lists were hand searched. The management options were compared for rates of miscarriage <24 weeks and preterm birth <34 weeks. Only studies with both expectant management and ER to twins were included in the analysis. The quality of each individual article was critically appraised and appropriate statistical methods were used to extract results. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In TCTA pregnancies managed expectantly (n = 501), the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were 7.4 and 50.2%, respectively. Meta-analysis demonstrated that ER to twins in TCTA pregnancies (n = 666) was associated with a lower risk (17.3 versus 50.2%) of preterm birth (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.28-0.48), whereas the risk of miscarriage (8.1% versus 7.4%) did not significantly increase (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.58-1.98). In DCTA triplets managed expectantly (n = 200), the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were 8.5 and 51.9%, respectively. Although the meta-analysis was inconclusive, it suggested that ER to twins in DCTA triplets, either of the foetus with a separate placenta (n = 15) or one of the monochorionic pair (n = 34), was neither significantly associated with an increased risk of miscarriage (8.5 versus 13.3%, P = 0.628 and RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.38-3.95, respectively) nor with a lower risk of preterm birth (51.9 versus 46.2%, P = 0.778 and RR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.04-5.7, respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: No randomized controlled trials of ER versus expectant management in TCTA or DCTA pregnancies were identified from our literature search. We were able to include only a handful of papers with small sample sizes and suffering from bias, and non-English publications were missed. Irrespective of the strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, publication bias was evident. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The greatest strength of our systematic review is that, contrary to the existing literature, it only included studies with both the intervention and expectant arm. Our results are in agreement with current literature. In TCTA pregnancies, ER to twins is associated with a lower risk of preterm birth but is not associated with a higher risk of miscarriage. In the absence of a randomized trial, the data from systematic reviews appear to be the best existing evidence for counselling in the first trimester on the different options available. Finally, in DCTA pregnancies, indications exist that ER (of one of the MC pair) to twins could possibly reduce the risk of preterm birth without increasing the risk of miscarriage.
引用
收藏
页码:1351 / 1359
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selective fetal reduction of uncomplicated dichorionic twins on parental request vs ongoing twins and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mitrogiannis, Ioannis
    Chatzakis, Christos
    Sotiriadis, Alexandros
    Makrydimas, Stylianos
    Katrachouras, Alexandros
    Efthymiou, Athina
    Makrydimas, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (11)
  • [42] The aetiology of preterm birth and risks of cerebral palsy and cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ylijoki, Milla
    Sentenac, Mariane
    Pape, Bernd
    Zeitlin, Jennifer
    Lehtonen, Liisa
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2024, 113 (04) : 643 - 653
  • [43] Delivery room interventions to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Mitra, Souvik
    Disher, Timothy
    Pichler, Gerhard
    D'Souza, Brandon
    Mccord, Helen
    Chayapathi, Varsha
    Jones, Karlee
    Schmolzer, Georg
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [44] Cesarean delivery is associated with lower neonatal mortality among breech pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preterm deliveries ≤32 weeks of gestation
    Unger, Vivien
    Gasparics, Akos
    Nagy, Zsuzsanna
    Hernadfoi, Mark
    Nagy, Rita
    Walter, Anna
    Farkas, Nelli
    Szabo, Miklos
    Hegyi, Peter
    Garami, Miklos
    Varga, Peter
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 231 (06) : 589 - 598.e21
  • [45] The risk of preterm birth of treated versus untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Danhof, Nora A.
    Kamphuis, Esme I.
    Limpens, Jacqueline
    van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R. C. W.
    Pajkrt, Eva
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 188 : 24 - 33
  • [46] Association between preterm delivery and the risk of maternal renal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Wenting
    Chen, Yingying
    Zhang, Xiaoxing
    Zhu, Qing
    Shen, Qilong
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2024, 28 (04)
  • [47] Effect of mode of delivery on perinatal outcome in severe preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Demertzidou, E.
    Chatzakis, C.
    Cavoretto, P.
    Sarafidis, K.
    Eleftheriades, M.
    Gerede, A.
    Dinas, K.
    Sotiriadis, A.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 (04) : 471 - 485
  • [48] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between maternal methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and preterm delivery
    Fang, Qiwen
    Jiang, Yixuan
    Liu, Zhenqiu
    Zhang, Zhijie
    Zhang, Tiejun
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 44 (04) : 663 - 672
  • [49] Cardiovascular disease risk in women with a history of spontaneous preterm delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Heida, Karst Y.
    Velthuis, Birgitta K.
    Oudijk, Martijn A.
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Bots, Michiel L.
    Franx, Arie
    van Dunne, Frederique M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [50] EUS versus percutaneous management of postoperative pancreatic fluid collection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohan, Babu
    Shakhatreh, Mohammed
    Dugyala, Sushma
    Geedigunta, Vaishali
    Gadalay, Ashwini
    Pahal, Parul
    Ponnada, Suresh
    Nagaraj, Kapil
    Asokkumar, Ravishankar
    Adler, Douglas
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2019, 8 (05) : 298 - +