Risks of miscarriage or preterm delivery in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:34
|
作者
Anthoulakis, C. [1 ]
Dagklis, T. [1 ]
Mamopoulos, A. [1 ]
Athanasiadis, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 3, Hippokrat Ippokrateio Gen Hosp Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
关键词
dichorionic triamniotic pregnancy; trichorionoc triamniotic pregnancy; embryo reduction; miscarriage; preterm birth; FETAL REDUCTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; TWINS; GESTATION; CHECKLIST; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; TRENDS; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dex084
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY QUESTION: Is pregnancy outcome in triplet pregnancies improved with embryo reduction (ER) to twins compared to expectant management? SUMMARY ANSWER: In trichorionic triplet pregnancies, ER to twins reduces the risk of preterm birth (<34 weeks) without significantly increasing the risk of miscarriage (<24 weeks), whereas in dichorionic triplet pregnancies, the results are inconclusive. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Triplet pregnancies are associated with a high risk of miscarriage and preterm birth. ER can ameliorate these conditions in higher order multiple gestations but is still controversial in triplets. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review, following the PRISMA guidelines, and critically appraise ER at 8-14 weeks of gestation in both trichorionic triamniotic (TCTA) and dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) pregnancies. Selective ER to twins was compared with expectant management, focusing on the risks of miscarriage and preterm birth. The computerized database search was performed on 8 January 2017. Overall, from 25 citations of relevance, eight studies with a total of 249 DCTA and 1167 TCTA pregnancies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A comprehensive computerized systematic literature search of all English language studies between 2000 and 2016 was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews (Cochrane Database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Google Scholar. Relevant article reference lists were hand searched. The management options were compared for rates of miscarriage <24 weeks and preterm birth <34 weeks. Only studies with both expectant management and ER to twins were included in the analysis. The quality of each individual article was critically appraised and appropriate statistical methods were used to extract results. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In TCTA pregnancies managed expectantly (n = 501), the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were 7.4 and 50.2%, respectively. Meta-analysis demonstrated that ER to twins in TCTA pregnancies (n = 666) was associated with a lower risk (17.3 versus 50.2%) of preterm birth (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.28-0.48), whereas the risk of miscarriage (8.1% versus 7.4%) did not significantly increase (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.58-1.98). In DCTA triplets managed expectantly (n = 200), the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were 8.5 and 51.9%, respectively. Although the meta-analysis was inconclusive, it suggested that ER to twins in DCTA triplets, either of the foetus with a separate placenta (n = 15) or one of the monochorionic pair (n = 34), was neither significantly associated with an increased risk of miscarriage (8.5 versus 13.3%, P = 0.628 and RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.38-3.95, respectively) nor with a lower risk of preterm birth (51.9 versus 46.2%, P = 0.778 and RR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.04-5.7, respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: No randomized controlled trials of ER versus expectant management in TCTA or DCTA pregnancies were identified from our literature search. We were able to include only a handful of papers with small sample sizes and suffering from bias, and non-English publications were missed. Irrespective of the strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, publication bias was evident. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The greatest strength of our systematic review is that, contrary to the existing literature, it only included studies with both the intervention and expectant arm. Our results are in agreement with current literature. In TCTA pregnancies, ER to twins is associated with a lower risk of preterm birth but is not associated with a higher risk of miscarriage. In the absence of a randomized trial, the data from systematic reviews appear to be the best existing evidence for counselling in the first trimester on the different options available. Finally, in DCTA pregnancies, indications exist that ER (of one of the MC pair) to twins could possibly reduce the risk of preterm birth without increasing the risk of miscarriage.
引用
收藏
页码:1351 / 1359
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gestational tissue transcriptomics in term and preterm human pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eidem, Haley R.
    Ackerman, William E.
    McGary, Kriston L.
    Abbot, Patrick
    Rokas, Antonis
    BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS, 2015, 8
  • [22] Gestational tissue transcriptomics in term and preterm human pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haley R. Eidem
    William E. Ackerman
    Kriston L. McGary
    Patrick Abbot
    Antonis Rokas
    BMC Medical Genomics, 8
  • [23] Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infections with preterm delivery; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmadi, Amjad
    Ramazanzadeh, Rashid
    Sayehmiri, Koroush
    Sayehmiri, Fatemeh
    Amirmozafari, Nour
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
  • [24] Dexamethasone versus betamethasone for preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Klein, Karen
    Colaci, Daniela
    Althabe, Fernando
    Belizan, Jose M.
    Deegan, Allie
    Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
    Florez, Ivan D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2021, 3 (03)
  • [25] Full-term induction of labor vs expectant management and cesarean delivery in women with obesity; systematic review and meta-analysis
    Krogh, Lise Qvirin
    Glavind, Julie
    Henriksen, Tine Brink
    Thornton, Jim
    Fuglsang, Jens
    Boie, Sidsel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (05)
  • [26] Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of different techniques
    Donepudi, Roopali
    Hessami, Kamran
    Nassr, Ahmed A.
    Espinoza, Jimmy
    Cortes, Magdalena Sanz
    Sun, Luming
    Shirazi, Mahboobeh
    Yinon, Yoav
    Belfort, Michael A.
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (05) : 646 - +
  • [27] Maternal, Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes of Triplet Pregnancies According to Chorionicity: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis
    Bernal Claverol, Mireia
    Ruiz Minaya, Maria
    Aracil Moreno, Irene
    Garcia Tizon, Santiago
    Pintado Recarte, Pilar
    Alvarez-Mon, Melchor
    Bravo Arribas, Coral
    Ortega, Miguel A.
    De Leon-Luis, Juan A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (07)
  • [28] Clinical effectiveness of reduction and fusion versus in situ fusion in the management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Dongfan
    Wang, Wei
    Han, Di
    Muthu, Sathish
    Cabrera, Juan P.
    Hamouda, Waeel
    Ambrosio, Luca
    Cheung, Jason P. Y.
    Le, Hai V.
    Vadala, Gianluca
    Buser, Zorica
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Cho, Samuel
    Yoon, S. Tim
    Lu, Shibao
    Chen, Xiaolong
    Diwan, Ashish D.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (05) : 1748 - 1761
  • [29] Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting preterm delivery A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Bo
    Zhang, Yong
    Chen, Shuangshuang
    Xiang, Xiaowei
    Wen, Juan
    Yi, Mei
    He, Baiyun
    Hu, Bing
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (29)
  • [30] Cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm births in multiple pregnancies with a short cervix: PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
    Thangatorai, Ramesh
    Lim, Fang Chan
    Nalliah, Sivalingam
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (12) : 1638 - 1645