Precision Farming at the Nexus of Agricultural Production and the Environment

被引:239
作者
Finger, Robert [1 ]
Swinton, Scott M. [2 ]
El Benni, Nadja [3 ]
Walter, Achim [4 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Agr Econ & Policy Grp, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Agroscope, Res Div Competitiveness & Syst Evaluat, CH-8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Crop Sci Grp, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 11 | 2019年 / 11卷
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
precision agriculture; smart farming; digitalization; variable rate technology; big data; site-specific management; sustainable intensification; technology adoption; BIG DATA; NITROGEN MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; YIELD PREDICTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093929
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Precision farming enables agricultural management decisions to be tailored spatially and temporally. Site-specific sensing, sampling, and managing allow farmers to treat a field as a heterogeneous entity. Through targeted use of inputs, precision farming reduces waste, thereby cutting both private variable costs and the environmental costs such as those of agrichemical residuals. At present, large farms in developed countries are the main adopters of precision farming. But its potential environmental benefits can justify greater public and private sector incentives to encourage adoption, including in small-scale farming systems in developing countries. Technological developments and big data advances continue to make precision farming tools more connected, accurate, efficient, and widely applicable. Improvements in the technical infrastructure and the legal framework can expand access to precision farming and thereby its overall societal benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 335
页数:23
相关论文
共 145 条
  • [81] Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps
    Mulla, David J.
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2013, 114 (04) : 358 - 371
  • [82] Profitability versus environmental performance: Are they competing?
    Muth, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2014, 69 (06) : 203A - 206A
  • [83] Naik Neha S., 2016, INT C INV COMP TECHN
  • [84] Delineation of Soil Management Zones for Variable-Rate Fertilization: A Review
    Nawar, Said
    Corstanje, Ronald
    Halcro, Graham
    Mulla, David
    Mouazen, Abdul M.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 143, 2017, 143 : 175 - 245
  • [85] Norton G. W., 2001, Tomorrow's agriculture: incentives, institutions, infrastructure and innovations. Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth International Conference of Agricultural Economists, Berlin, Germany, 13-18 August 2000, P269
  • [86] Economic and policy issues of US agricultural pesticide use trends
    Osteen, Craig D.
    Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge
    [J]. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 69 (09) : 1001 - 1025
  • [87] Environmental impact and economic benefits of site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) in irrigated rice systems
    Pampolino, M. F.
    Manguiat, I. J.
    Ramanathan, S.
    Gines, H. C.
    Tan, P. S.
    Chi, T. T. N.
    Rajendran, R.
    Buresh, R. J.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 93 (1-3) : 1 - 24
  • [88] Adoption of precision agriculture technologies by German crop farmers
    Paustian, Margit
    Theuvsen, Ludwig
    [J]. PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2017, 18 (05) : 701 - 716
  • [89] Nudging Farmers to Comply With Water Protection Rules - Experimental Evidence From Germany
    Peth, Denise
    Musshoff, Oliver
    Funke, Katja
    Hirschauer, Norbert
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 152 : 310 - 321
  • [90] Aspects of precision agriculture
    Pierce, FJ
    Nowak, P
    [J]. ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 67, 1999, 67 : 1 - 85