Comparative Analysis of Modeling Algorithms for Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation in a Subtropical Region

被引:171
作者
Gao, Yukun [1 ]
Lu, Dengsheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Guiying [1 ]
Wang, Guangxing [3 ]
Chen, Qi [4 ]
Liu, Lijuan [1 ]
Li, Dengqiu [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Agr & Forestry Univ, State Key Lab Subtrop Silviculture, Key Lab Carbon Cycling Forest Ecosyst & Carbon Se, Sch Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Michigan State Univ, Ctr Global Change & Earth Observat, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
[3] Southern Illinois Univ, Dept Geog, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
[4] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Geog, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
aboveground biomass; linear regression; machine learning algorithms; remote sensing imagery; stratification; subtropical forests; NEAREST NEIGHBORS TECHNIQUE; REMOTE-SENSING DATA; RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION; AIRBORNE LIDAR; KNN-ESTIMATION; L-BAND; LANDSAT; SATELLITE; INVENTORY; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.3390/rs10040627
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Remote sensing-based forest aboveground biomass (AGB) estimation has been extensively explored in the past three decades, but how to effectively combine different sensor data and modeling algorithms is still poorly understood. This research conducted a comparative analysis of different datasets (e.g., Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM), ALOS PALSAR L-band data, and their combinations) and modeling algorithms (e.g., artificial neural network (ANN), support vector regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and linear regression (LR)) for AGB estimation in a subtropical region under non-stratification and stratification of forest types. The results show the following: (1) Landsat TM imagery provides more accurate AGB estimates (root mean squared error (RMSE) values in 27.7-29.3 Mg/ha) than ALOS PALSAR (RMSE values in 30.3-33.7 Mg/ha). The combination of TM and PALSAR data has similar performance for ANN and SVR, worse performance for RF and KNN, and slightly improved performance for LR. (2) Overestimation for small AGB values and underestimation for large AGB values are major problems when using the optical (e.g., Landsat) or radar (e.g., ALOS PALSAR) data. (3) LR is still an important tool for AGB modeling, especially for the AGB range of 40-120 Mg/ha. Machine learning algorithms have limited effects on improving AGB estimation overall, but ANN can improve AGB modeling when AGB values are greater than 120 Mg/ha. (4) Forest type and AGB range are important factors that influence AGB modeling performance. (5) Stratification based on forest types improved AGB estimation, especially when AGB was greater than 160 Mg/ha, using the LR approach. This research provides new insight for remote sensing-based AGB modeling for the subtropical forest ecosystem through a comprehensive analysis of different source data, modeling algorithms, and forest types. It is critical to develop an optimal AGB modeling procedure, including the collection of a sufficient number of sample plots, extraction of suitable variables and modeling algorithms, and evaluation of the AGB estimates.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   A QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FOREST GROWTH-RATES AND THEMATIC MAPPER REFLECTANCE MEASUREMENTS [J].
AHERN, FJ ;
ERDLE, T ;
MACLEAN, DA ;
KNEPPECK, ID .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1991, 12 (03) :387-400
[2]   Characterizing stand-level forest canopy cover and height using Landsat time series, samples of airborne LiDAR, and the Random Forest algorithm [J].
Ahmed, Oumer S. ;
Franklin, Steven E. ;
Wulder, Michael A. ;
White, Joanne C. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 101 :89-101
[3]   Capabilities and limitations of Landsat and land cover data for aboveground woody biomass estimation of Uganda [J].
Avitabile, Valerio ;
Baccini, Alessandro ;
Friedl, Mark A. ;
Schmullius, Christiane .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 117 :366-380
[4]   Forest biomass estimation over regional scales using multisource data [J].
Baccini, A ;
Friedl, MA ;
Woodcock, CE ;
Warbington, R .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (10) :L105011-4
[5]   A first map of tropical Africa's above-ground biomass derived from satellite imagery [J].
Baccini, A. ;
Laporte, N. ;
Goetz, S. J. ;
Sun, M. ;
Dong, H. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 3 (04)
[6]   Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Dragut, Lucian .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 :24-31
[7]   Improving k-nearest neighbor predictions in forest inventories by combining high and low density airborne laser scanning data [J].
Breidenbach, Johannes ;
Naesset, Erik ;
Gobakken, Terje .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 117 :358-365
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]   Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors [J].
Chander, Gyanesh ;
Markham, Brian L. ;
Helder, Dennis L. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 113 (05) :893-903
[10]  
Chavez PS, 1996, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V62, P1025