Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Response to Micro-Rates of Three Dicamba-Based Herbicides

被引:17
|
作者
Osipitan, O. Adewale [1 ]
Scott, Jon E. [1 ]
Knezevic, Stevan Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Northeast Res & Extens Ctr, Haskell Ag Lab, Concord, NE 68728 USA
关键词
SYNTHETIC AUXIN HERBICIDES; PALMER AMARANTH; 2,4-D; WATERHEMP; INJURY;
D O I
10.2134/age2018.10.0052
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Core IdeasThe impact of simulated dicamba drift on growth and yield of glyphosate-resistant soybean was similar among dicamba formulations.The impact of dicamba drift on soybean could be influenced by moisture condition of the environmental field.Late vegetative or early flowering stage of soybean was the most sensitive growth stage to dicamba drift. New dicamba-based herbicides such as Engenia (N,N-bis-(3-aminopropyl) methylamine salt) and XtendiMax (diglycolamine salt) with VaporGrip technology were developed to reduce dicamba volatility and drift; however, there are claims that these products can still volatilize or drift. Field studies were conducted to evaluate glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine))-resistant (GR) soybean response to micro-rates (0, 1/1000, 1/500, 1/100, 1/50, and 1/10 of the label rate, 560 g a.e. ha(-1)) of the two new dicamba products compared with Clarity (diglycolamine salt) applied at three growth stages. The GR soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] was equally impacted by the micro-rates of all three products as measured by visual injury, height reduction, delayed physiological maturity, and yield reduction. The greatest visual injury (80%), plant height reduction (65%), maturity delay (22 d), and soybean yield loss (96%) was caused by 1/10 of the dicamba label rate when applied at V7/R1 soybean growth stage. In addition, estimation of effective dose for 5, 10, or 20% yield reduction suggested that V7/R1 was the most sensitive soybean growth stage to the three dicamba products. For example, 10% yield reduction occurred when 1.83 to 1.85 g a.e. ha(-1) (similar to 1/300 of the label rate) of Engenia was applied at V2 or R2, whereas, a lower dose of 0.32 g a.e. ha(-1) (1/1750 of the label rate) of Engenia caused the same level of yield reduction when applied at V7/R1. Similar doses were estimated for Clarity and XtendiMax; therefore dicamba drift should be avoided at all costs, because GR soybean was equally sensitive to low rates of all three tested products with different formulations or technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp with preemergence herbicides in glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 99 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [2] Influence of Glyphosate/Dicamba Application Rate and Timing on the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (06) : 678 - 682
  • [3] Influence of glyphosate/dicamba application rate and timing on the control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Hooker, David C.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 99 (03) : 371 - 374
  • [4] Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar response to glyphosate
    Elmore, RW
    Roeth, FW
    Klein, RN
    Knezevic, SZ
    Martin, A
    Nelson, LA
    Shapiro, CA
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (02) : 404 - 407
  • [5] Late postemergence glufosinate-based programs for glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth control in dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Kumar, Vipan
    Aulakh, Jatinder S.
    Liu, Rui
    Jhala, Amit J.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 6 (02)
  • [6] Single and sequential applications of dicamba for the control of glyphosate-resistant common ragweed in glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant soybean
    Byker, Holly P.
    Van Wely, Annemarie C.
    Soltani, Nadar
    Lawton, Mark B.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 98 (03) : 552 - 556
  • [7] Influence of Herbicides on Competition Weed and Glyphosate-resistant Soybean
    Liu Sheng-nan
    Ding Wei
    Journal of Northeast Agricultural University(English Edition), 2019, 26 (02) : 15 - 24
  • [8] Interaction of dicamba, fluthiacet-methyl, and glyphosate for control of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in dicamba/glyphosate-resistant soybean
    de Sanctis, Jose H. S.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (05) : 761 - 767
  • [9] Effect of carrier volume and spray quality on glyphosate-resistant soybean response to sublethal dicamba exposure
    Sperry, Benjamin P.
    Calhoun, Justin S.
    Ferguson, Jason C.
    Kruger, Greg R.
    Bond, Jason A.
    Johnson, Ashli B.
    Reynolds, Daniel B.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 77 (06) : 2719 - 2725
  • [10] Control of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane in soybean with preplant herbicides
    Soltani, N.
    Brown, L. R.
    Sikkema, P. H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 97 (03) : 408 - 410