fMRI-adaptation evidence of overlapping neural representations for objects related in function or manipulation

被引:36
作者
Yee, Eiling [1 ]
Drucker, Daniel M. [1 ]
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Semantic representations; Semantic features; Semantic attributes; Adaptation; fMRI; Action; Repetition suppression; Embodiment; MODALITY SPECIFICITY; SEMANTIC MEMORY; BRAIN ACTIVITY; KNOWLEDGE; WORDS; ACTIVATION; CATEGORY; MODULATION; REPETITION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.036
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Sensorimotor-based theories of semantic memory contend that semantic information about an object is represented in the neural substrate invoked when we perceive or interact with it. We used fMRI adaptation to test this prediction, measuring brain activation as participants read pairs of words. Pairs shared function (flashlight-lantern), shape (marble-grape), both (pencil-pen), were unrelated (saucer-needle), or were identical (drill-drill). We observed adaptation for pairs with both function and shape similarity in left premotor cortex. Further, degree of function similarity was correlated with adaptation in three regions: two in the left temporal lobe (left medial temporal lobe, left middle temporal gyrus), which has been hypothesized to play a role in mutimodal integration, and one in left superior frontal gyrus. We also found that degree of manipulation (i.e., action) and function similarity were both correlated with adaptation in two regions: left premotor cortex and left intraparietal sulcus (involved in guiding actions). Additional considerations suggest that the adaptation in these two regions was driven by manipulation similarity alone; thus, these results imply that manipulation information about objects is encoded in brain regions involved in performing or guiding actions. Unexpectedly, these same two regions showed increased activation (rather than adaptation) for objects similar in shape. Overall, we found evidence (in the form of adaptation) that objects that share semantic features have overlapping representations. Further, the particular regions of overlap provide support for the existence of both sensorimotor and amodal/multimodal representations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 763
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Allport D.A., 1985, Current perspectives in dysphasia, P32
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, U S FLORIDA WORD ASS
  • [3] Barsalou LW, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P577, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
  • [4] Semantic Adaptation and Competition during Word Comprehension
    Bedny, Marina
    McGill, Megan
    Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2008, 18 (11) : 2574 - 2585
  • [5] Item analysis in functional magnetic resonance imaging
    Bedny, Marina
    Aguirre, Geoffrey K.
    Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 35 (03) : 1093 - 1102
  • [6] A parieto-premotor network for object manipulation: evidence from neuroimaging
    Binkofski, F
    Buccino, G
    Stephan, KM
    Rizzolatti, G
    Seitz, RJ
    Freund, HJ
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 128 (1-2) : 210 - 213
  • [7] Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging
    Boronat, CB
    Buxbaum, LJ
    Coslett, HB
    Tang, K
    Saffran, EM
    Kimberg, DY
    Detre, JA
    [J]. COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 23 (2-3): : 361 - 373
  • [8] Randomized event-related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI
    Burock, MA
    Buckner, RL
    Woldorff, MG
    Rosen, BR
    Dale, AM
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 1998, 9 (16) : 3735 - 3739
  • [9] Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI
    Buxbaum, Laurel J.
    Kyle, Kathleen M.
    Tang, Kathy
    Detre, John A.
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1117 : 175 - 185
  • [10] Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects
    Buxbaum, LJ
    Saffran, EM
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 82 (02) : 179 - 199