The Effect of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Rectal Indomethacin on Pain during Office Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study

被引:20
|
作者
Senturk, Mehmet Baki [1 ]
Guraslan, Hakan [2 ]
Babaoglu, Bulent [2 ]
Yasar, Levent [2 ]
Polat, Mesut [1 ]
机构
[1] Zeynep Kamil Gynecol & Pediat Training & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Opr Dr Burhanettin Ustunel Cad 10, TR-34668 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Teaching & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Analog Pain Scale; Anesthesia; Hysteroscopy; DIAGNOSTIC HYSTEROSCOPY; OUTPATIENT HYSTEROSCOPY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1159/000441787
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Backgrounds/Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rectal and intrauterine anesthesia during vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to rectal indomethacin, intrauterine lidocaine and placebo groups. Patients with conditions that could cause or contribute to pelvic pain were excluded. Pain was evaluated with Visual Analog Scale, when the cervical canal was passed, while within the cavity and at 10 min after procedure. The Analog Pain Scale scores of the 3 groups were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance test. A value of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The study included a total of 206 patients. No difference was seen between the groups in respect of indication, age, gravid and duration of procedure. While the anesthesia was determined as superior to the placebo in reducing pain at all 3 stages (p < 0.05), intrauterine lidocaine was determined to be more effective than rectal indomethacin in reducing pain within the cavity and 10 min after the procedure (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Rectal or intrauterine anesthesia applied with the vaginoscopic technique is useful in hysteroscopy. However, intrauterine anesthesia is more effective in reducing pain. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 284
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stepwise pain score analysis of the effect of local lignocaine on outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Wong, AYK
    Wong, KS
    Tang, LCH
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (06) : 1234 - 1237
  • [22] Lignocaine aerosol spray in outpatient hysteroscopy: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Davies, A
    Richardson, RE
    OConnor, H
    Baskett, TF
    Nagele, F
    Magos, AL
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1997, 67 (06) : 1019 - 1023
  • [23] Effectiveness of lidocaine spray on radial arterial puncture pain: A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial
    Yildiz, Ismail Ufuk
    Yildirim, Cagdas
    Ozhasenekler, Ayhan
    Sener, Alp
    Gokhan, Servan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 50 : 724 - 728
  • [24] Oral Diclofenac Potassium Versus Hyoscine-N-Butyl Bromide in Reducing Pain Perception during Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial
    Abbas, Ahmed M.
    Elzargha, Ahmed M.
    Ahmed, Abdel Ghaffar M.
    Mohamed, Ibrahim I.
    Altraigey, Ahmed
    Abdelbadee, Ahmed Y.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (04) : 709 - 716
  • [25] A Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Study of Jet Lidocaine Compared to Jet Placebo for Pain Relief in Children Undergoing Needle Insertion in the Emergency Department
    Auerbach, Marc
    Tunik, Michael
    Mojica, Michael
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (05) : 388 - 393
  • [26] Intrauterine lidocaine for pain control during laminaria insertion: a randomized controlled trial
    Mercier, Rebecca J.
    Liberty, Abigail
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 90 (06) : 594 - 600
  • [27] Tramadol versus Celecoxib for reducing pain associated with outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Hassan, A.
    Wahba, A.
    Haggag, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [28] The effect of phloroglucinol on pain in first-trimester surgical abortion: a double-blind randomized controlled study
    Zhuang, Yaling
    Zhu, Xiufang
    Huang, Li-Li
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 81 (02) : 157 - 160
  • [29] Efficacy of 0.25% Lidocaine Versus 0.5% Lidocaine in Dermatologic Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Dokic, Yelena
    Mireles, Nabor Stephen
    Hu, Aileen Y.
    Joshi, Tejas P.
    Shimizu, Ikue
    Ranario, Jennifer Song
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2025, 51 (01) : 30 - 33
  • [30] Lidocaine and tenoxicam effectiveness for pain relief during Pipelle: Non-randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Sargin, Mehmet Akif
    Yassa, Murat
    Celik, Ayhan
    Ergun, Emrah
    Tug, Niyazi
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 67 (04) : 527 - 533