Needle applicator displacement during high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer

被引:36
作者
Yoshida, Ken [1 ]
Yamazaki, Hideya [2 ]
Nose, Takayuki [3 ]
Shiomi, Hiroya [4 ]
Yoshida, Mineo
Mikami, Mari
Takenaka, Tadashi
Kotsuma, Tadayuki
Tanaka, Eiichi
Kuriyama, Keiko
Harada, Yasunori [5 ]
Tohda, Akira [5 ]
Yasunaga, Yutaka [5 ]
Oka, Toshitsugu [5 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Natl Hosp, Natl Hosp Org, Dept Radiol, Chuo Ku, Osaka 5400006, Japan
[2] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Dept Radiol, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[5] Osaka Natl Hosp, Natl Hosp Org, Dept Urol, Osaka 5400006, Japan
关键词
Applicator displacement; Ambulatory technique; High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy; Prostate cancer; HDR BRACHYTHERAPY; EXTERNAL-BEAM; MONOTHERAPY; CATHETER; FEASIBILITY; FRACTIONS; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2009.04.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To introduce an effective ambulatory technique in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for prostate cancer, we investigated the displacement distance using our novel calculation method. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-four patients treated with HDR-ISBT as monotherapy were examined. Of these, 4, 17, and 43 patients were administered treatment doses of 38 Gy (3 days), 49 Gy (4 days), and 54 Gy (5 days), respectively. For dose administration, we used 776 flexible applicators with a removable template (ambulatory technique). Using CT images, we calculated the relative coordinates of the metal markers and applicators. From these coordinates, to analyze displacement during treatment, we measured the distance between the tip of the needle applicator and the center of gravity of the markers along the average applicator vector. RESULTS: The median displacement distance for all applicators was 7 mm (range, -14 to 24), and that of each treatment schedule was 4, 6, and 9 mm for 38, 49, and 54 Gy, respectively. Of the 776 applicators, displacement of >10 mm was seen in 198 (26%) applicators and >15 mm in 57 (7%) applicators. Body height (p < 0.0001) and anticoagulant usage (p < 0.0001) were significant factors influencing displacement. CONCLUSIONS: We investigated needle applicator displacement using our unique method. Additional cranial margins are necessary if there is no repositioning of the dwell position. CT scanning should be performed daily during treatment for checking the position of the applicator to detect and rectify the issue of displacement. (C) 2010 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 41
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Needle displacement during high-dose-rate afterloading brachytherapy boost and conventional external beam radiation therapy for initial and local advanced prostate cancer
    Pellizzon, ACA
    Salvajoli, JV
    Novaes, PERS
    Maia, MAC
    Ferigno, R
    Fogaroli, RC
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2003, 70 (03) : 200 - 204
  • [22] The emerging role of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Yoshida, Ken
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Nonomura, Norio
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (05) : 781 - 788
  • [23] Low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer - between options
    Skowronek, Janusz
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 5 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [24] High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
    Beriwal, Sushil
    Bhatnagar, Ajay
    Heron, Dwight E.
    Selvaraj, Raj
    Mogus, Robert
    Kim, Hayeon
    Gerszten, Kristina
    Kelley, Joseph
    Edwards, Robert P.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2006, 5 (04) : 218 - 222
  • [25] Fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy in prostate cancer: Does implant displacement and its correction influence acute and late toxicity?
    Aluwini, Shafak
    Busser, Wendy M. H.
    Baartman, Lizette E. A.
    Bhawanie, Anand
    Alemayehu, Wendimagegn G.
    Boormans, Joost L.
    Kolkman-Deurloo, Inger-Karine K.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 15 (06) : 707 - 713
  • [26] Second salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer
    Maenhout, Metha
    van Vulpen, Marco
    Moerland, Marinus
    Peters, Max
    Meijer, Richard
    van den Bosch, Maurice
    Nguyen, Paul
    Frank, Steven
    van Zyp, Jochem van der Voort
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 9 (02) : 161 - 166
  • [27] Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for local recurrence of prostate cancer
    Yagudaev, D. M.
    Kadyrov, Z. A.
    Kalinin, M. R.
    Bezhenar, V. A.
    Kalyagina, N. A.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2018, 14 (02): : 171 - 175
  • [28] American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Rogers, Leland
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    Morton, Gerard
    Prestidges, Bradley R.
    Pouliot, Jean
    Cohen, Gil'ad N.
    Zaider, Marco
    Ghilezan, Mihai
    Hsu, I-Chow
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2012, 11 (01) : 20 - 32
  • [29] Robustness of IPSA optimized high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans to catheter displacements
    Poder, Joel
    Whitaker, May
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 8 (03) : 203 - 209
  • [30] HIGH-DOSE-RATE MONOTHERAPY: SAFE AND EFFECTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    Martinez, Alvaro A.
    Ghilezan, Michel
    Hill, Dennis R.
    Schour, Lionel
    Brandt, David
    Gustafson, Gary
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (05): : 1286 - 1292