Phase II clinical trials in oncology: are we hitting the target?

被引:0
|
作者
Ang, Mei-Kim [1 ]
Tan, Say-Beng [2 ]
Lim, Wan-Teck [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore
[2] Singapore Clin Res Inst, Singapore 138669, Singapore
关键词
biomarker; cytostatic agent; end point; enrichment; Phase II study; randomization; targeted therapy; PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL; RANDOMIZED DISCONTINUATION DESIGN; RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASES; END-POINTS; LUNG-CANCER; SOFT-TISSUE; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; IMATINIB MESYLATE; 2-STAGE DESIGNS;
D O I
10.1586/ERA.09.178
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The number of novel and molecularly targeted agents in the last decade that need screening for preliminary efficacy in Phase II trials has increased. Many of these agents have a cytostatic mode of action that is difficult to assess using traditional Phase II designs. These new agents require detailed evaluation to optimize their dosing, to evaluate their effects on their target and to define early markers that predict for a definitive benefit. This review focuses on the options for Phase II trial designs. The different end points, single versus multiarm and randomized designs, the use of biomarkers and Bayesian approaches are also reviewed. The final design chosen will depend on the characteristics and circumstances of each individual study.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 438
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Why Do Phase III Clinical Trials in Oncology Fail so Often?
    Amiri-Kordestani, Laleh
    Fojo, Tito
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2012, 104 (08) : 568 - 569
  • [32] Biomarker-Driven Early Clinical Trials in Oncology A Paradigm Shift in Drug Development
    Tan, Daniel S. W.
    Thomas, George V.
    Garrett, Michelle D.
    Banerji, Udai
    de Bono, Johann S.
    Kaye, Stan B.
    Workman, Paul
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2009, 15 (05) : 406 - 420
  • [33] Clinical utility estimation for assay cutoffs in early phase oncology enrichment trials
    Lunceford, Jared K.
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2015, 14 (03) : 233 - 241
  • [34] Evaluation of spin in oncology clinical trials
    Wayant, C.
    Margalski, D.
    Vaughn, K.
    Vassar, M.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2019, 144
  • [35] Methodology of phase II clinical trials in metastatic elderly breast cancer: a literature review
    Cabarrou, B.
    Mourey, L.
    Dalenc, F.
    Balardy, L.
    Kanoun, D.
    Roche, H.
    Boher, J. M.
    Rouge-Bugat, M. E.
    Filleron, Thomas
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (03) : 505 - 513
  • [36] Clinical trials in the era of personalized oncology
    Maitland, Michael L.
    Schilsky, Richard L.
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2011, 61 (06) : 365 - 381
  • [37] Investigational drugs in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of neuroblastoma
    Amoroso, Loredana
    Haupt, Riccardo
    Garaventa, Alberto
    Ponzoni, Mirco
    EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 2017, 26 (11) : 1281 - 1293
  • [38] Endpoints for clinical trials and revised assessment in neuro-oncology
    Butowski, Nicholas
    Chang, Susan M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2012, 25 (06) : 780 - 785
  • [39] The future of clinical trials in urological oncology
    Narayan, Vikram M.
    Dahm, Philipp
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2019, 16 (12) : 722 - 733
  • [40] A Systematic Review of Adaptive Seamless Clinical Trials for Late-Phase Oncology Development
    Broglio, Kristine
    Cooner, Freda
    Wu, Yujun
    Xiao, Mike
    Xue, X. Q.
    Lowen, Marina
    Ikhapoh, Izuagie
    He, Philip
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2024, 58 (05) : 917 - 929