Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing

被引:12
作者
Schiedat, Fabian [1 ]
Schoene, Dominik [1 ]
Aweimer, Assem [1 ]
Boesche, Leif [1 ]
Ewers, Aydan [1 ]
Gotzmann, Michael [2 ]
Patsalis, Polykarpos C. [1 ]
Muegge, Andreas [1 ]
Kloppe, Axel [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ, Univ Hosp Bergmannsheil Bochum, Dept Cardiol & Angiol, D-44789 Bochum, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ, St Josef Hosp Bochum, Dept Cardiol, Bochum, Germany
关键词
Heart failure; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Cardiac resynchronization therapy response; Left ventricular reverse remodeling; Multipoint pacing; CRT optimization; ACUTE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE; HEART-FAILURE; CLINICAL-RESPONSE; ESC GUIDELINES; OPTIMIZATION; PREVENTION; GERMANY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-019-01499-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Multipoint pacing [Multipoint (TM) Pacing (MPP), Abbott] via a single left ventricular lead (Quartet (TM) LV lead, Abbott) improves acute left ventricular (LV) function and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Aim of this study was to examine additional benefits in terms of LV reverse remodeling and CRT response by activating MPP in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing (CONV). Methods 43 consecutive patients receiving CRT (Quadra Assura MP (TM), Abbott) received LV dP/dt(max) optimized CONV programming for 6 months. MPP programming with large anatomical electrode separation (> 30 mm) and basal LV1 pacing location was activated afterwards. Echocardiographic and clinical parameters were obtained at baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-up (FU). The response was defined as an improvement of LVESV >= 15% and super-response as improvement >= 30% relative to baseline. Results 41 patients completed FU (one died of non-cardiac cause and one was lost to FU) and after 6 months CONV, 26 patients (63%) were classified as CRT responders. With MPP, the response rate increased to 90% (p < 0.001). Super-response also improved significantly with MPP compared to CONV (71% vs. 22%; p < 0.005). LV reverse remodeling in terms of LVESV improved significantly with MPP compared to CONV (79 +/- 45 ml vs. 103 +/- 64 ml; p < 0.001). NYHA-class only improved significantly with CONV relative to baseline (1,8 +/- 0,7 vs. 2,7 +/- 0,5; p < 0.001), but not further with MPP (1,7 +/- 0,6 vs. 1,8 +/- 0,7; p = 0.49). Conclusion Multipoint pacing significantly improves response and super-response to CRT as well as LV reverse remodeling compared to conventional biventricular pacing. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 193
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice
    Akerstrom, Finn
    Narvaez, Irene
    Puchol, Alberto
    Pachon, Marta
    Martin-Sierra, Cristina
    Rodriguez-Manero, Moises
    Rodriguez-Padial, Luis
    Arias, Miguel A.
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2018, 20 (07): : 1161 - 1167
  • [2] ICD lead type and RV lead position in CRT-D recipients
    Benz, Alexander P.
    Vamos, Mate
    Erath, Julia W.
    Bogyi, Peter
    Duray, Gabor Z.
    Hohnloser, Stefan H.
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 107 (12) : 1122 - 1130
  • [3] 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)
    Brignole, Michele
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Baron-Esquivias, Gonzalo
    Bordachar, Pierre
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    Breithardt, Ole-A
    Cleland, John
    Deharo, Jean-Claude
    Delgado, Victoria
    Elliott, Perry M.
    Gorenek, Bulent
    Israel, Carsten W.
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Linde, Cecilia
    Mont, Lluis
    Padeletti, Luigi
    Sutton, Richard
    Vardas, Panos E.
    Luis Zamorano, Jose
    Achenbach, Stephan
    Baumgartner, Helmut
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    Bueno, Hector
    Dean, Veronica
    Deaton, Christi
    Erol, Cetin
    Fagard, Robert
    Ferrari, Roberto
    Hasdai, David
    Hoes, Arno W.
    Kirchhof, Paulus
    Knuuti, Juhani
    Kolh, Philippe
    Lancellotti, Patrizio
    Linhart, Ales
    Nihoyannopoulos, Petros
    Piepoli, Massimo F.
    Ponikowski, Piotr
    Sirnes, Per Anton
    Luis Tamargo, Juan
    Tendera, Michal
    Torbicki, Adam
    Wijns, William
    Windecker, Stephan
    Kirchhof, Paulus
    Blomstrom-Lundqvist, Carina
    Badano, Luigi P.
    Aliyev, Farid
    Baensch, Dietmar
    Baumgartner, Helmut
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (29) : 2281 - 2329
  • [4] Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP)
    Forleo, Giovanni B.
    Santini, Luca
    Giammaria, Massimo
    Potenza, Domenico
    Curnis, Antonio
    Calabrese, Vito
    Ricciardi, Danilo
    D'agostino, Carlo
    Notarstefano, Pasquale
    Ribatti, Valentina
    Morani, Giovanni
    Mantica, Massimo
    Di Biase, Luigi
    Bertaglia, Emanuele
    Calo, Leonardo
    Zanon, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (07): : 1170 - 1177
  • [5] Comparison of stimulation sites within left ventricular veins on the acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Gold, MR
    Auricchio, A
    Hummel, JD
    Giudici, MC
    Ding, J
    Tockman, B
    Spinelli, J
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2005, 2 (04) : 376 - 381
  • [6] Current developments in cardiac rhythm management devices
    Halbfass, Philipp
    Sonne, Kai
    Nentwich, Karin
    Ene, Elena
    Deneke, Thomas
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 107 : S100 - S104
  • [7] Higher prevalence of heart failure in rural regions: a population-based study covering 87% of German inhabitants
    Holstiege, Jakob
    Akmatov, Manas K.
    Stoerk, Stefan
    Steffen, Annika
    Baetzing, Joerg
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 108 (10) : 1102 - 1106
  • [8] Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Burri, Haran
    Curnis, Antonio
    Delnoy, Peter Paul
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    Sperzel, Johannes
    Lee, Kwangdeok
    Calo, Leonardo
    Vicentini, Alfredo
    Fernandez Concha, Joaquin
    Thibault, Bernard
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 (35) : 2979 - 2987
  • [9] Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): Clinical trials, guidelines, and target populations
    Linde, Cecilia
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth
    McAlister, Finlay A.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2012, 9 (08) : S3 - S13
  • [10] Randomized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization in Mildly Symptomatic Heart Failure Patients and in Asymptomatic Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Previous Heart Failure Symptoms
    Linde, Cecilia
    Abraham, William T.
    Gold, Michael R.
    Sutton, Martin St. John
    Ghio, Stefano
    Daubert, Claude
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (23) : 1834 - 1843