A pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method based on similarity measure and its application to project delivery system selection

被引:6
作者
Li, Huimin [1 ]
Su, Limin [2 ]
Cao, Yongchao [1 ]
Lv, Lelin [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Dept Construct Engn & Management, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Sch Management & Econ, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pythagorean fuzzy sets; Similarity measure; Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS method; Project delivery system; CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; SETS; EXTENSION; RANKING;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-181690
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs), as an extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) for dealing with uncertainty information, have attracted considerable attention in the decision-making area. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is one of the most popular decision-making approaches. In the TOPSIS method, the desired alternative should have not only the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution, but also the farthest distance from the negative ideal solution Similarity measures play an important role in assessing the degree between ideal and proposal alternatives in decision-making Thus, this paper aims to provide an extended TOPSIS by developing new similarity measures with PFSs and applying it to multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) development of three new similarity measures with PFSs, and investigation of their properties; (2) extension of the TOPSIS method based on the proposed similarity measures; and (3) establishment of a Pythagorean fuzzy decision-making method using the improved TOPSIS method. A case study on the selection of a project delivery system is conducted to show the applicability of the presented approach.
引用
收藏
页码:7059 / 7071
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Aikhuele D. O., 2017, DECISION SCI LETT, V6, P365, DOI DOI 10.5267/J.DSL.2017.2.002
  • [2] Project Delivery System Selection with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Group Decision-Making Method
    An, Xiaowei
    Wang, Zhuofu
    Li, Huimin
    Ding, Jiyong
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2018, 27 (04) : 689 - 707
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, Syst. Eng. Procedia, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SEPRO.2012.04.019
  • [4] MORE ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS
    ATANASSOV, KT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 33 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [5] INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS
    ATANASSOV, KT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [6] Beg I, 2017, J ARTIF INTELL SOFT, V7, P103, DOI 10.1515/jaiscr-2017-0007
  • [7] Biswas P., 2014, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, V8, P46
  • [8] Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review
    Blanco-Mesa, Fabio
    Merigo, Jose M.
    Gil-Lafuente, Anna M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (03) : 2033 - 2050
  • [9] Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
    Chen, CT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [10] The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making
    Chen, Ting-Yu
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 26 : 57 - 73