Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access

被引:53
作者
Rodd, Jennifer M. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Expt Psychol, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
cognition; comprehension; language; communication; lexical ambiguity; vocabulary; word-meaning access; LEXICAL AMBIGUITY; INTERLINGUAL HOMOGRAPHS; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; CONTEXTUAL STRENGTH; CONVERGING EVIDENCE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; OLD WORDS; RESOLUTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1177/1745691619885860
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Most words are ambiguous: Individual word forms (e.g., run) can map onto multiple different interpretations depending on their sentence context (e.g., the athlete/politician/river runs). Models of word-meaning access must therefore explain how listeners and readers can rapidly settle on a single, contextually appropriate meaning for each word that they encounter. I present a new account of word-meaning access that places semantic disambiguation at its core and integrates evidence from a wide variety of experimental approaches to explain this key aspect of language comprehension. The model has three key characteristics. (a) Lexical-semantic knowledge is viewed as a high-dimensional space; familiar word meanings correspond to stable states within this lexical-semantic space. (b) Multiple linguistic and paralinguistic cues can influence the settling process by which the system resolves on one of these familiar meanings. (c) Learning mechanisms play a vital role in facilitating rapid word-meaning access by shaping and maintaining high-quality lexical-semantic knowledge throughout the life span. In contrast to earlier models of word-meaning access, I highlight individual differences in lexical-semantic knowledge: Each person's lexicon is uniquely structured by specific, idiosyncratic linguistic experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 427
页数:17
相关论文
共 97 条
[21]   Lexical knowledge without a lexicon? [J].
Elman, Jeffrey L. .
MENTAL LEXICON, 2011, 6 (01) :1-33
[22]   Learning new meanings for known words: biphasic effects of prior knowledge [J].
Fang, Xiaoping ;
Perfetti, Charles ;
Stafura, Joseph .
LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 32 (05) :637-649
[23]  
Fodor J. A., 1983, MODULARITY MIND
[24]   The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard [J].
Frisson, Steven ;
Pickering, Martin J. .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2007, 22 (04) :595-613
[25]   Contextual priming of word meanings is stabilized over sleep [J].
Gaskell, M. Gareth ;
Cairney, Scott A. ;
Rodd, Jennifer M. .
COGNITION, 2019, 182 :109-126
[26]   Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words [J].
Gaskell, MG ;
Dumay, N .
COGNITION, 2003, 89 (02) :105-132
[27]   Listeners and Readers Generalize Their Experience With Word Meanings Across Modalities [J].
Gilbert, Rebecca A. ;
Davis, Matthew H. ;
Gaskell, M. Gareth ;
Rodd, Jennifer M. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2018, 44 (10) :1533-1561
[28]   IMPAIRMENTS OF LEXICAL SEMANTIC PROCESSING IN APHASIA - EVIDENCE FROM THE PROCESSING OF LEXICAL AMBIGUITIES [J].
HAGOORT, P .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1993, 45 (02) :189-232
[29]   On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework [J].
Hagoort, P .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (09) :416-423
[30]   Nodes and networks in the neural architecture for language: Broca's region and beyond [J].
Hagoort, Peter .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2014, 28 :136-141