Interference of a weed community in the soybean crop in functions of sowing spacing

被引:13
作者
Vitorino, Hermeson dos Santos [1 ]
da Silva Junior, Antonio Carlos [1 ]
Goncalves, Clebson Gomes [1 ]
Martins, Dagoberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Dept Prod Vegetal, Area Matol, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA | 2017年 / 48卷 / 04期
关键词
Critical Periods; Phytosociology; Glycine max; Weed Competition; CORN ZEA-MAYS; GLYCINE-MAX; PERIODS; YIELD;
D O I
10.5935/1806-6690.20170070
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The use of double row spacing on soybean crop is recent and consists of a new soybean production technology in Brazil and worldwide, so weed interference may be different in relation to single crop row. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the weed interference in soybean crop in function of sowing spacing. The experimental design was randomized blocks and treatments were arranged in a factorial (2x16): two spacings, a double row spacing [(0.20 x 0.20 m) x 0.67 m] and a conventional single row spacing (0.45 x 0.45 m) and sixteen periods of weed management, being eight control periods in which soybean was kept free of weeds by increasing periods of 7; 14; 21; 28; 35; 42; 49 and 145 days after emergence and eight coexistence periods, when the crop was maintained in the presence of the weed community for the same periods. The Critical Timing of Weed Removal (CTWR) was lower in the double row spacing, with eight days, compared with single spacing that was of 18 days. The Critical Weed-Free Period (CWFP) was of 36 and 31 days for double and single row spacing, respectively, and the emergence of weeds after this period did not cause damage to the productivity, but the Critical Period of Weed Control (CPWC) was higher in double row spacing (28 days) compared to the single row, which was of 13 days. The spacing in double row had a higher grain yield than the spacing in single row.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 613
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of Dissection with Glyphosate and Chlorimuron-Ethyl on Weed Community and Soybean Yield
    Carvalho, L. B.
    Scherer, L. C.
    Lucio, F. R.
    Alves, P. L. C. A.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2009, 27 : 1025 - 1034
  • [22] Weed control and crop safety in sulfonylurea/glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Ganie, Zahoor A.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2020, 100 (06) : 629 - 641
  • [23] Effect of Corn and Panicum maximum Intercropping on Weed and Soybean Crop in Rotation
    Correia, N. M.
    Leite, M. B.
    Daniel, B.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2011, 29 (03) : 545 - 555
  • [24] Soybean row spacing and weed emergence time influence weed competitiveness and competitive indices
    Hock, SM
    Knezevic, SZ
    Martin, AR
    Lindquist, JL
    WEED SCIENCE, 2006, 54 (01) : 38 - 46
  • [25] The influence of crop density and sowing delay on weed germination in winter wheat
    Ona, Auskalniene
    Grazina, Kadziene
    Birute, Jomantaite
    28TH GERMAN CONFERENCE ON WEED BIOLOGY AND WEED CONTROL, 2018, 458 : 307 - 310
  • [26] INFLUENCE OF SOWING DATES AND PLANTING METHODS ON WEED DYNAMICS IN WHEAT CROP
    Farooq, Omer
    Cheema, Zahid Ata
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2014, 51 (04): : 817 - 825
  • [27] Periods of Weed Interference in Carrot in Function of Spacing Between Rows
    Freitas, F. C. L.
    Almeida, M. E. L.
    Negreiros, M. Z.
    Honorato, A. R. F.
    Mesquita, H. C.
    Silva, S. V. O. F.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2009, 27 (03) : 473 - 480
  • [28] Effects of news sowing arrangements and air assistance on fungicide spray distribution on soybean crop
    de Souza, Diego Miranda
    Raetano, Carlos Gilberto
    Ferreira Moreira, Caio Alexandre
    Oliveira de Freitas Bueno, Regiane Cristina
    Carvalho, Marina Mouzinho
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY, 2019, 41
  • [30] A cultural system to reduce weed interference in organic soybean
    Anderson, Randy L.
    RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2015, 30 (04) : 392 - 398