Leg stiffness adjustment during hopping at different intensities and frequencies

被引:5
作者
Mrdakovic, Vladimir [1 ]
Ilic, Dusko [1 ]
Vulovic, Radun [2 ]
Matic, Milan [1 ]
Jankovic, Nenad [1 ]
Filipovic, Nenad [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Sport & Phys Educ, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[2] Bioengn Res & Dev Ctr, Kragujevac, Serbia
[3] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Mech Engn, Kragujevac, Serbia
关键词
joint stiffness; jumping performance; preferred hopping frequency; spring-mass model; SHORTENING CYCLE EXERCISE; VERTICAL JUMP; MUSCULOSKELETAL STIFFNESS; LOWER-EXTREMITY; ELASTIC ENERGY; DROP JUMP; POWER; MUSCLES; PERFORMANCE; DETERMINANT;
D O I
10.5277/abb140308
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Understanding leg and joint stiffness adjustment during maximum hopping may provide important information for developing more effective training methods. It has been reported that ankle stiffness has major influence on stable spring-mass dynamics during submaximal hopping, and that knee stiffness is a major determinant for hopping performance during maximal hopping task. Furthermore, there are no reports on how the height of the previous hop could affect overall stiffness modulation of the subsequent maximum one. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether and how the jump height of the previous hop affects leg and joint stiffness for subsequent maximum hop. Ten participants completed trials in which they repeatedly hopped as high as possible (MX task) and trials in which they were instructed to perform several maximum hops with 3 preferred (optimal) height hops between each of them (P3MX task). Both hopping tasks were performed at 2.2 Hz hopping frequency and at the participant's preferred (freely chosen) frequency as well. By comparing results of those hopping tasks, we found that ankle stiffness at 2.2 Hz (p = 0.041) and knee stiffness at preferred frequency (p = 0.045) was significantly greater for MX versus P3MX tasks. Leg stiffness for 2.2 Hz hopping is greater than for the preferred frequency. Ankle stiffness is greater for 2.2 Hz than for preferred frequencies; opposite stands for knee stiffness. The results of this study suggest that preparatory hop height can be considered as an important factor for modulation of maximum hop.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   Leg stiffness and expertise in men jumping [J].
Laffaye, G ;
Bardy, BG ;
Durey, A .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 (04) :536-543
[22]   THE MECHANICS OF RUNNING - HOW DOES STIFFNESS COUPLE WITH SPEED [J].
MCMAHON, TA ;
CHENG, GC .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1990, 23 :65-78
[23]   A simple method for measuring stiffness during running [J].
Morin, JB ;
Dalleau, G ;
Kyröläinen, H ;
Jeannin, T ;
Belli, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 21 (02) :167-180
[24]  
Mrdakovic V, 2008, J SPORT SCI MED, V7, P269
[25]  
Pietraszewski B, 2011, ACTA BIOENG BIOMECH, V13, P13
[26]   Influence of training background on the relationships between plantarflexor intrinsic stiffness and overall musculoskeletal stiffness during hopping [J].
Rabita, Giuseppe ;
Couturier, Antoine ;
Lambertz, Daniel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 103 (02) :163-171
[27]   Leg stiffness during phases of countermovement and take-off in vertical jump [J].
Struzik, Artur ;
Zawadzki, Jerzy .
ACTA OF BIOENGINEERING AND BIOMECHANICS, 2013, 15 (02) :113-118
[28]  
TAYLOR CR, 1985, J EXP BIOL, V115, P253
[29]   Performing the vertical jump: Movement adaptations for submaximal jumping [J].
Vanrenterghem, J ;
Lees, A ;
Lenoir, M ;
Aerts, P ;
De Clercq, D .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 22 (06) :713-727
[30]   The influence of musculotendinous stiffness on drop jump performance [J].
Walshe, AD ;
Wilson, GJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYSIOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 1997, 22 (02) :117-132