Surgery for acute cholecystitis in Denmark

被引:5
作者
Ainsworth, Alan P. [1 ]
Adamsen, Sven
Rosenberg, Jacob
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Hosp Gentofte, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
acute cholecystitis; cholecystectomy; epidemiology; laparoscopic;
D O I
10.1080/00365520601176007
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. Despite laparoscopic cholecystectomy being the preferred treatment for elective cholecystectomy, surgery for acute cholecystitis is often performed using the open method. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and to determine the proportion of laparoscopically completed procedures compared with all cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis. Material and methods. Data from the Danish National Patient Registry were analysed. The annual numbers of all cholecystectomies and of cholecystectomies performed for acute cholecystitis from 1996 to 2004 were registered. Separate data for open and laparoscopic operations were obtained. Results. An increase in the number of cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis from 13.6 in 1996 to 17.2/100,000 in 2004 was observed (p < 0.05). In 1996, 41% of cholecystectomies performed for acute cholecystitis were completed laparoscopically as compared with 64% in 2004 (p < 0.05). For laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed for reasons other than acute cholecystitis, the corresponding rates were 78% and 87%, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The total number of patients having cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis has increased as has the rate of laparoscopically completed procedures. It is not known whether it is possible to obtain a further reduction in the number of open cholecystectomies.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 651
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Adamsen S, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V184, P571
[2]  
Bakr A A, 1997, JSLS, V1, P119
[3]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Prospective trial [J].
Eldar, S ;
Sabo, E ;
Nash, E ;
Abrahamson, J ;
Matter, I .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 21 (05) :540-545
[4]   Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis [J].
Johansson, M ;
Thune, A ;
Nelvin, L ;
Stiernstam, M ;
Westman, B ;
Lundell, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (01) :44-49
[5]   Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis [J].
Kiviluoto, T ;
Sirén, J ;
Luukkonen, P ;
Kivilaakso, E .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9099) :321-325
[6]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Is it really safe? [J].
Kum, CK ;
Eypasch, E ;
Lefering, R ;
Paul, A ;
Neugebauer, E ;
Troidl, H .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (01) :43-49
[7]  
Lai PBS, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P764
[8]   A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy [J].
Livingston, EH ;
Rege, RV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (03) :205-211
[9]   Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis [J].
Lo, CM ;
Liu, CL ;
Fan, ST ;
Lai, ECS ;
Wong, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (04) :461-467
[10]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis - A prospective study [J].
Lujan, JA ;
Parrilla, P ;
Robles, R ;
Marin, P ;
Torralba, JA ;
Garcia-Ayllon, J .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (02) :173-175