Volume of high-dose regions and likelihood of locoregional control after perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy: Do hotter implants work better?

被引:8
作者
Martinez-Monge, Rafael [1 ]
Cambeiro, Mauricio [1 ]
Ramos, Luis I. [1 ]
Olarte, Alicia [1 ]
Valtuena, German [1 ]
San-Julian, Mikel [2 ]
Alcalde, Juan [3 ]
Naval-Gias, Luis [4 ]
Jurado, Matias [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
[2] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
[3] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
[4] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Oral Surg, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
[5] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Gynecol, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
关键词
Perioperative; High-dose rate; High-dose regions; Locoregional control; SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS; PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION; EXTREMITY; SURGERY; MARGIN; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2014.05.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine whether perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) implants with larger high-dose regions produce increased locoregional control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients (n = 166) enrolled in several PHDRB prospective studies conducted at the University of Navarre were analyzed. The PHDRB was given to total doses of 16 Gy/4 b.i.d. or 24 Gy/6 b.i.d. treatments for negative or close/positive margins along with 45 Gy125 Rx of external beam radiation therapy. The histogram-based generalized equivalent uniform dose (EUD) formulism was used to quantify and standardize the dose volume histogram into 2-Gy equivalents. The region of interest analyzed included: tissue volume encompassed by the prescription isodose of 4 Gy (TV100). Routine dose reporting parameters such as physical dose and single-point 2-Gy equivalent dose were used for reference. RESULTS: After a median followup of 7.4 years (range, 3-12+), 50 patients have failed, and 116 remain controlled at last followup. Overall, EUD was not different in the patients who failed compared with controls (89.1 Gy vs. 86.5 Gy; p = not significant). When patients were stratified by risk using the University of Navarre Predictive Model, very high-risk patients (i.e., tumors >= 3 cm resected with close <1 mm/positive margins) had an improved locoregional control with higher EUD values (p = 0.028). This effect was not observed in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk University of Navarre Predictive Model categories. CONCLUSIONS: In very high-risk patients, enlarged high-dose regions can produce a dose-response effect. Routine dose reporting methods such as physical dose and single-point 2-Gy equivalent dose may. not show this effect, but it can be revealed by histogram-based EUD assessment. (C) 2014 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 596
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effect of Needle Number on the Quality of High-dose-rate Prostate Brachytherapy Implants
    Froehlich, Georgina
    Agoston, Peter
    Loevey, Jozsef
    Polgar, Csaba
    Major, Tibor
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (04) : 593 - 599
  • [2] Perioperative high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Deo, S. V. Suryanarayana
    Rath, Goura Kisor
    Shukla, Nootan Kumar
    Bakhshi, Sameer
    Gandhi, Ajeet Kumar
    Julka, Pramod Kumar
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 14 (04) : 571 - 577
  • [3] Time to loading and locoregional control in perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy: The tumor bed effect revisited
    Martinez-Monge, Rafael
    Valtuena, German
    Santisteban, Marta
    Cambeiro, Mauricio
    Arbea, Leyre
    Ramos, Luis I.
    Olarte, Alicia
    San-Julian, Mikel
    Alcalde, Juan
    Naval-Gias, Luis
    Jurado, Matias
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 14 (04) : 565 - 570
  • [4] Perioperative high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost for patients with early breast cancer
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Deo, S. V. S.
    Rath, Goura Kisor
    Shukla, Nootan Kumar
    Thulkar, Sanjay
    Madan, Renu
    Julka, Pramod Kumar
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2013, 99 (05): : 604 - 610
  • [5] Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy after breast conserving surgery
    Rulli, Antonio
    Barberini, Francesco
    Scialpi, Michele
    Izzo, Luciano
    D'Angeli, Ilaria
    Gori, Stefania
    Sidoni, Angelo
    Rondelli, Fabio
    Noya, Giuseppe
    Aristei, Cinzia
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2010, 24 (02) : 417 - 422
  • [6] Perioperative morbidity and mortality of high-dose-rate gynecologic brachytherapy
    Petereit, DG
    Sarkaria, JN
    Chappell, RJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (05): : 1025 - 1031
  • [7] INTERACTION OF 2-Gy EQUIVALENT DOSE AND MARGIN STATUS IN PERIOPERATIVE HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY
    Martinez-Monge, Rafael
    Cambeiro, Mauricio
    Moreno, Marta
    Gaztanaga, Miren
    San Julian, Mikel
    Alcalde, Juan
    Jurado, Matias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (04): : 1158 - 1163
  • [8] High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for the treatment of high-volume locally recurrent endometrial carcinoma
    Huang, Kitty
    D'Souza, David
    Patil, Nikhilesh
    Velker, Vikram
    Leung, Eric
    Stitt, Larry
    Whiston, Frances
    Sugimoto, Akira
    McGee, Jacob
    Prefontaine, Michel
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 15 (05) : 543 - 548
  • [9] Phase I-II trial of perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer
    Martinez-Monge, Rafael
    Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso
    Cambeiro, Mauricio
    Garran, Cristina
    Montesdeoca, Nestor
    Aristu, Jose Javier
    Alcalde, Juan
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2009, 8 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [10] Experience in multicatheter interstitial high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy: dose-volume histogram analysis of the first results
    Demianovich, Alena
    Sanin, Dmitriy
    Martynova, Valeriya
    Borysheva, Natalia
    Obuhov, Aleksandr
    Aminov, Gamzat
    Gulidov, Igor
    Mardyntsky, Yuriy
    Kiseleva, Marina
    Ivanov, Sergey
    Kaprin, Andrey
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (04) : 349 - 355