Ambient aerosol and its carbon content in gainesville, a mid-scale city in Florida

被引:3
作者
Chuaybamroong, Paradee [1 ]
Cayse, Kimberleigh
Wu, Chang-Yu
Lundgren, Dale A.
机构
[1] Thammasat Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Environm Sci, Pathum Thani 12121, Thailand
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Soil & Water Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Environm Engn Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
mass size distribution; elemental carbon; organic carbon; total carbon; MOUDI;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-006-9336-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ambient aerosols were collected during 2000-2001 in Gainesville, Florida, using a micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI) to study mass size distribution and carbon composition. A bimodal mass distribution was found in every sample with major peaks for aerosols ranging from 0.32 to 0.56 mu m, and 3.2 to 5.6 mu m in diameter. The two distributions represent the fine mode (< 2.5 mu m) and the coarse mode (> 2.5 mu m) of particle size. Averaged over all sites and seasons, coarse particles consisted of 15% carbon while fine particles consisted of 22% carbon. Considerable variation was noted between winter and summer seasons. Smoke from fireplaces in winter appeared to be an important factor for the carbon, especially the elemental carbon contribution. In summer, organic carbon was more abundant. The maximum secondary organic carbon was also found in this season (7.0 mu g m(-3)), and the concentration is between those observed in urban areas (15-20 mu g m(-3)) and in rural areas (4-5 mu g m(-3)). However, unlike in large cities where photochemical activity of anthropogenic emissions are determinants of carbon composition, biogenic sources were likely the key factor in Gainesville. Other critical factors that affect the distribution, shape and concentration were precipitation, brushfire and wind.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 430
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
*AL COUNT AIR QUAL, 1999, AL COUNT AIR QUAL CO
[2]   Field validation of a semi-continuous method for aerosol black carbon (aethalometer) and temporal patterns of summertime hourly black carbon measurements in southwestern PA [J].
Allen, GA ;
Lawrence, J ;
Koutrakis, P .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (05) :817-823
[3]   ANALYSIS OF CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS IN SOUTHERN-CALIFORNIA ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS [J].
APPEL, BR ;
COLODNY, P ;
WESOLOWSKI, JJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1976, 10 (04) :359-363
[4]   HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS FROM NATURAL VEGETATION IN CALIFORNIA SOUTH-COAST-AIR-BASIN [J].
AREY, J ;
CROWLEY, DE ;
CROWLEY, M ;
RESKETO, M ;
LESTER, J .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 29 (21) :2977-2988
[5]  
BROWN MJ, 1995, RESOURCE B SRS, V48
[6]   PROBLEMS IN THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF CARBON PARTICULATE [J].
CADLE, SH ;
GROBLICKI, PJ ;
MULAWA, PA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1983, 17 (03) :593-600
[7]   ATMOSPHERIC CARBONACEOUS SPECIES MEASUREMENT METHODS COMPARISON STUDY - GENERAL-MOTORS RESULTS [J].
CADLE, SH ;
MULAWA, PA .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 12 (01) :128-141
[8]   Particle size distribution of aerosol carbons in ambient air [J].
Chen, SJ ;
Liao, SH ;
Jian, WJ ;
Lin, CC .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 23 (04) :475-488
[9]   Sources and chemistry of PM(10) aerosol in Santa Barbara County, CA [J].
Chow, JC ;
Watson, JG ;
Lowenthal, DH ;
Countess, RJ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 30 (09) :1489-1499
[10]  
*CIT GAIN, 2004, GAIN GEN FACTS