Comparison of Outcomes between Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy through Inframammary Fold Incision versus Noninframammary Fold Incision

被引:13
作者
Roh, Tai Suk [1 ]
Kim, Jae Yoon [1 ]
Jung, Bok Ki [1 ]
Jeong, Joon [2 ]
Ahn, Sung Gwe [2 ]
Kim, Young Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 211 Eonju Ro, Seoul 06273, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Breast implants; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; IMMEDIATE RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT-SATISFACTION; CANCER; EXPERIENCE; ALLODERM; SAFETY;
D O I
10.4048/jbc.2018.21.2.213
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: In properly selected patients with breast cancer, nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is generally considered safe by oncologic standards. We examined two groups of patients who underwent direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction after NSM, comparing complications encountered, revision rates, and aesthetic outcomes. The patients were stratified based on type of surgical incision and assigned to inframammary fold (IMF) and non-IMF groups. Methods: We investigated 141 patients (145 breasts) subjected to NSM and immediate DTI reconstruction between 2013 and 2016. A total of 62 breasts (in 58 patients) were surgically removed via IMF incisions, with the other 83 breasts (in 83 patients) removed by non-IMF means. Results: Complications associated with IMF (n=62) and non-IMF (n=83) incisions were as follows: skin necrosis (IMF, 9; non-IMF, 18); hematoma (IMF, 3; non-IMF, 4); seroma (IMF, 8; non-IMF, 4); mild capsular Purpose: In properly selected patients with breast cancer, nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is generally considered safe by oncologic standards. We examined two groups of patients who underwent direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction after NSM, comparing complications encountered, revision rates, and aesthetic outcomes. The patients were stratified based on type of surgical incision and assigned to inframammary fold (IMF) and non-IMF groups. Methods: We investigated 141 patients (145 breasts) subjected to NSM and immediate DTI reconstruction between 2013 and 2016. A total of 62 breasts (in 58 patients) were surgically removed via IMF incisions, with the other 83 breasts (in 83 patients) removed by non-IMF means. Results: Complications associated with IMF (n=62) and non-IMF (n=83) incisions were as follows: skin necrosis (IMF, 9; non-IMF, 18); hematoma (IMF, 3; non-IMF, 4); seroma (IMF, 8; non-IMF, 4); mild capsular contracture (IMF, 4; non-IMF, 7); and tumor recurrence (IMF, 2; non-IMF, 8). Surgical revisions were counted as duplicates (IMF, 18; non-IMF, 38). Aesthetic outcomes following IMF incisions were rated as very good (44.2%), good (23.1%), fair (23.1%), or poor (9.6%). Conclusion: IMF incision enables complete preservation of the nipple-areolar complex, yielding superior aesthetic results in immediate DTI breast reconstruction after NSM. The nature of incision used had no significant impact on postoperative complications or reoperation rates and had comparable oncologic safety to that of non-IMF incisions. IMF incisions produced the least visible scarring and did not affect breast shape. Most patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 221
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] A Paradigm Shift in US Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates
    Albornoz, Claudia R.
    Bach, Peter B.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Disa, Joseph J.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    McCarthy, Colleen M.
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    Matros, Evan
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [2] Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: A prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients
    Benediktsson, K. P.
    Perbeck, L.
    [J]. EJSO, 2008, 34 (02): : 143 - 148
  • [3] The Lateral Inframammary Fold Incision for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Outcomes from Over 50 Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions
    Blechman, Keith M.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Levovitz, Chaya
    Guth, Amber A.
    Axelrod, Deborah M.
    Shapiro, Richard L.
    Choi, Mihye
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (01) : 31 - 40
  • [4] Oncologic Safety of Nipple Skin-Sparing or Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomies With Immediate Reconstruction
    Boneti, Cristiano
    Yuen, James
    Santiago, Carlos
    Diaz, Zuleika
    Robertson, Yara
    Korourian, Soheila
    Westbrook, Kent C.
    Henry-Tillman, Ronda S.
    Klimberg, V. Suzanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 212 (04) : 686 - 693
  • [5] Current strategies with 1-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction
    Colwell, Amy S.
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2015, 4 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [6] Retrospective Review of 331 Consecutive Immediate Single-Stage Implant Reconstructions with Acellular Dermal Matrix: Indications, Complications, Trends, and Costs
    Colwell, Amy S.
    Damjanovic, Branimir
    Zahedi, Bita
    Medford-Davis, Laura
    Hertl, Catherine
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (06) : 1170 - 1178
  • [7] An Inferolateral Approach to Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Optimizing Mastectomy and Reconstruction
    Colwell, Amy S.
    Gadd, Michele
    Smith, Barbara L.
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2010, 65 (02) : 140 - 143
  • [8] CRILE G, 1973, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V136, P929
  • [9] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer and Risk-Reducing Surgery: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience
    de Alcantara Filho, Paulo
    Capko, Deborah
    Barry, John Mitchel
    Morrow, Monica
    Pusic, Andrea
    Sacchini, Virgilio S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (11) : 3117 - 3122
  • [10] Why do women accept to undergo a nipple sparing mastectomy or to reconstruct the nipple areola complex when nipple sparing mastectomy is not possible?
    Didier, F.
    Arnaboldi, P.
    Gandini, S.
    Maldifassi, A.
    Goldhirsch, A.
    Radice, D.
    Minotti, I.
    Ballardini, B.
    Luini, A.
    Santillo, B.
    Rietjens, M.
    Petit, J. Y.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 132 (03) : 1177 - 1184