Tobacco Control Policy Adoption Dynamics: A Case Study of Missouri Communities

被引:3
作者
Everett, Kevin D. [1 ]
Chadwick, Ginny [1 ]
Cowan, Stanley R. [1 ]
Kinkade, Emily [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Family & Community Med, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Truman State Univ, Kirksville, MO USA
关键词
Tobacco control; Tobacco; 21; Smokefree policy; Relative advantage; Social construction;
D O I
10.1007/s10900-018-0487-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Tobacco control policies reduce the health and economic burden caused by tobacco. With over half of the United States communities lacking adequate protective policies, an examination of policy adoption factors can provide insights to facilitate policy adoption. A case study approach examines the rate of adoption, prominent media frames, policy leaders' perceptions and coalition activities for smokefree and Tobacco 21 policies adopted in Missouri. Findings show compared to smokefree policy, Tobacco 21 requires a considerably shorter timeframe and fewer resources for adoption. Tobacco 21 coalitions target a small group of stakeholders compared to smokefree coalitions' emphasis on broad community engagement. Both policies are formally opposed, but elected officials perceive less political risk supporting Tobacco 21. As a new tobacco control policy tool, Tobacco 21 has relative advantage that should be considered by community health advocates.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 809
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TOBACCO NATION DEADL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, MUNICIPALITIES LOCAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, WHAT EXPECT TOBACCO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, BEST PRACTICES USER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, State Tobacco Control Laws Policies Database
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SMOKE FREE POLICIES
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BROKEN PROMISES OUR
[8]  
[Anonymous], POL REC GUID
[9]  
ANRF, 2018, SUMM 100 SMOK STAT L
[10]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014, BEST PRACT COMPR TOB