Navigator-gated MR angiography of the renal arteries: A potential screening tool for renal artery stenosis

被引:45
|
作者
Maki, Jeffrey H.
Wilson, Gregory J.
Eubank, William B.
Glickerman, David J.
Millan, Juan A.
Hoogeveen, Romhild M.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Puget Sound VA Hlth Care Syst, Dept Radiol S113, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] UW Med Lake Union, Vasc Imaging Lab, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Radia Inc, Everett, WA USA
[4] Philips Med Syst, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/AJR.06.1138
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine how well unenhanced navigator-gated steady-state free precession ( Nav SSFP) MR angiography ( MRA) performs as a screening test for the detection of renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty patients referred to rule out renal artery stenosis were imaged using an optimized Nav SSFP MRA sequence before conventional contrast-enhanced MRA ( CE-MRA). Two radiologists evaluated Nav SSFP for maximum stenosis measurement, and comparison was made with CE-MRA results. RESULTS. Fifteen of the 40 patients had greater than 50% renal artery stenosis as determined on CE-MRA. Sensitivity for detecting renal artery stenosis with Nav SSFP was 100%; specificity, 84%; negative predictive value, 100%; and positive predictive value, 79%. The average mean stenosis difference between Nav SSFP and CE-MRA was 10% +/- 9%. CONCLUSION. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for the detection of renal artery stenosis using Nav SSFP were perfect, with an acceptable specificity of 84%. This suggests Nav SSFP is a promising technique for simple unenhanced screening for the detection of renal artery stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:W540 / W546
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Phase-contrast MR angiography for detection of arteriosclerotic renal artery stenosis
    Duda, SH
    Schick, F
    Teufl, F
    MullerSchimpfle, M
    Erley, C
    Schneider, W
    Miller, S
    Claussen, CD
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1997, 38 (02) : 287 - 291
  • [22] ABDOMINAL-AORTA AND RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - EVALUATION WITH MR ANGIOGRAPHY
    KIM, D
    EDELMAN, RR
    KENT, KC
    PORTER, DH
    SKILLMAN, JJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) : 727 - 731
  • [23] EFFECT OF FLOW DISTURBANCES ON MR-ANGIOGRAPHY IN RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS
    ORTEGA, HV
    VINITSKI, S
    MOHAMED, FB
    OUTWATER, EK
    FARO, SH
    MITCHELL, DG
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 187 - 187
  • [24] Comparison of conventional angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis
    Gilfeather, M
    Yoon, H
    Nowers, K
    Axel, L
    Schnall, MD
    SchlanskyGoldberg, RD
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 271 - 271
  • [25] Renal artery stenosis: Evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography
    Gilfeather, M
    Yoon, HC
    Siegelman, ES
    Axel, L
    Stolpen, AH
    Shlansky-Goldberg, RD
    Baum, RA
    Soulen, MC
    Schnall, MD
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (02) : 367 - 372
  • [26] Helical CT angiography of renal artery stenosis
    Rubin, GD
    Napel, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (04) : 1109 - 1110
  • [27] Screening of renal artery stenosis: Assessment with magnetic resonance angiography at 1.0 T
    Laissy, JP
    Benyounes, M
    Limot, O
    Cinqualbre, A
    Benamer, H
    Kenouch, S
    HenryFeugeas, MC
    Falise, B
    Chillon, S
    Valere, PE
    SchoumanClaeys, E
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1996, 14 (09) : 1033 - 1041
  • [28] Why screening for a renal artery stenosis?
    Stephan, D.
    Griffon, C.
    Hamade, A.
    Jahn, C.
    Welsch, M.
    Mounier-Vehier, C.
    ARCHIVES DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DES VAISSEAUX, 2007, 100 (10): : 872 - 877
  • [29] Screening for renal artery stenosis: Is it justified?
    Zierler, RE
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 77 (04) : 307 - 308
  • [30] Improved Renal Perfusion Measurement With a Dual Navigator-Gated Q2TIPS FAIR Technique
    Song, Ruitian
    Loeffler, Ralf B.
    Hillenbrand, Claudia M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2010, 64 (05) : 1352 - 1359