Bioequivalence study between two formulations of ciclosporin A (Cyclavance® oral solution and Atopica® soft capsules) following a single oral administration to dogs

被引:10
|
作者
Navarro, C. [1 ]
Seguy, L.
Vila, M. [2 ]
Birckel, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Virbac, Dept Med, Carros, France
[2] AmatsiAvogadro, Bioserv Dept, Fontenilles, France
关键词
Dog; Ciclosporin; Cyclosporine A; Bioequivalence; Pharmacokinetics; Substitution; Interchangeability; HPLC; DERMATITIS; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1186/s12917-016-0669-9
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Background: Ciclosporin is a selective immunomodulator used for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in dogs. A new 100 mg/ml oral solution formulation (Cyclavance (R), Virbac) was developed as a pharmaceutical equivalent to the marketed capsule formulations (Atopica (R), Novartis Animal Health) containing 25, 50 mg, or 100 mg of ciclosporin A. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the pharmacokinetic profiles and bioequivalence of the two formulations following a single oral administration to dogs. This randomised, two-period, two-sequence, crossover bioequivalence study was conducted in 40 healthy dogs under fasting conditions. Each dog received either one 50 mg capsule of Atopica (R) or 0.5 ml of Cyclavance (R). After dosing, blood samples were collected during a 48-h time period at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. Blood ciclosporin A concentrations were measured by using an HPLC-MS/MS method. Cmax, Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity and Kel were determined for the two ciclosporin formulations. Bioequivalence was to be concluded if the 90 % confidence intervals were within the range of 80 % to 125 % for Cmax and AUC0-t. Dogs were monitored once daily throughout the study period for adverse effects. Results: The 90 % confidence intervals for Cyclavance (R)/Atopica (R) mean ratios of the log-transformed pharmacokinetic variables Cmax and AUC0-t were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 80 % to 125 % (Point estimate: 101.2 % and 101.4 % respectively). Except for salivation reported after administration of both products, or vomiting and diarrhoea reported after Atopica (R) administration, both formulations were well tolerated in the 40 healthy dogs over the 48-h study period. Conclusions: The two ciclosporin oral formulations demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic profiles and were found to be bioequivalent, and therefore, interchangeable.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bioequivalence study between two formulations of ciclosporin A (Cyclavance® oral solution and Atopica® soft capsules) following a single oral administration to dogs
    C. Navarro
    L. Séguy
    M. Vila
    P. Birckel
    BMC Veterinary Research, 12
  • [2] Comparison of whole blood concentrations of oral human generic modified ciclosporin capsules with microemulsified ciclosporin capsules approved for canine atopic dermatitis following a single oral administration to healthy dogs
    Vargo, Cheryl
    Austel, Michaela
    Banovic, Frane
    VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 34 (02) : 156 - 160
  • [3] Bioequivalence study of two formulations of enrofloxacin following oral administration in chickens
    Posyniak, A
    Zmudzki, J
    Niedzielska, J
    Biernacki, B
    BULLETIN OF THE VETERINARY INSTITUTE IN PULAWY, 2001, 45 (02) : 353 - 358
  • [4] Bioequivalence evaluation of menthol after oral administration of peppermint oil soft capsules in dogs
    Wu, Jing-Fang
    Xiang, Bing-Ren
    Li, Kui-Xing
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2010, 60 (08): : 479 - 482
  • [5] Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two cyclosporine oral solution formulations in cats
    Yang, Yuxin
    Kong, Jingyuan
    Liu, Yu
    Wu, Qinyao
    Cao, Yuying
    Qiu, Jicheng
    Zhang, Lu
    Gong, Xiaohui
    Zhao, Fuhua
    Cao, Xingyuan
    Wang, Jianzhong
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [6] Voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies
    Navarro, Christelle
    Crastes, Nolwenn
    Benizeau, Elodie
    McGahie, David
    IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2015, 68
  • [7] Bioequivalence of two oral formulations of nizatidine capsules in healthy male volunteers
    Lockyer, M
    Al-Dgither, S
    Al-Gaai, E
    Yousuf, A
    Hammami, MM
    BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 2005, 26 (03) : 117 - 120
  • [8] The Bioequivalence Between Valsartan Oral Solution and Suspension Formulations Developed for Pediatric Use
    Sivasubramanian, Rama
    Sunkara, Gangadhar
    Karan, Rajesh
    Zhou, Wei
    Zhang, Yiming
    Sangana, Ramachandra
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 11 (07): : 843 - 848
  • [9] Bioequivalence of Some Sulphonamide Formulations Following Oral Administration in Broilers
    Altintas, Levent
    Yarsan, Ender
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2009, 15 (02) : 217 - 223
  • [10] Bioequivalence of two oral formulations of triflusal capsules in healthy volunteers
    Quetglas, Emilio Garcia
    Companero, Miguel Angel
    Sadaba, Belen
    Escolar, Manuel
    Azanza, Jose Ramon
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2008, 58 (06): : 283 - 287