Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer

被引:54
|
作者
Baldini, E
Gardin, G
Giannessi, PG
Evangelista, G
Roncella, M
Prochilo, T
Collecchi, P
Rosso, R
Lionetto, R
Bruzzi, P
Mosca, F
Conte, PF
机构
[1] St Chiara Univ Hosp, Div Med Oncol, Pisa, Italy
[2] Ist Sci Studio & Cura Tumori, Genoa, Italy
[3] St Chiara Univ Hosp, Div Pathol, Pisa, Italy
[4] Ist Sci Studio & Cura Tumori, Clin Epidemiol & Trials Unit, Genoa, Italy
[5] Ist Sci Studio & Cura Tumori, Hlth Direct Clin Serv, Genoa, Italy
[6] St Chiara Univ Hosp, Div Surg, Pisa, Italy
关键词
dose-dense chemotherapy; locally advanced breast cancer; randomised trial;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdg069
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dose-dense primary chemotherapy on pathological response rate (pCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with combined modality therapy. Patients and methods: Stage IIIA/IIIB patients received three courses of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) followed by local therapy (total mastectomy or segmental mastectomy with axillary nodes dissection) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with three courses of CEF alternated with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were randomized to receive ICT and ACT every 3. weeks (arm A, 'standard treatment') or every 2 weeks with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support (arm B, 'dose-dense treatment'). In both arms radiotherapy was administered after the end of chemotherapy (in selected cases) and patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. Results: A total of 150 patients were randomized (77 arm A and 73 arm 13) and demographics were well balanced between the two arms. Compliance to treatment was excellent: 95% and 93% of patients in arms A and 13, respectively, completed the treatment program with no modification or delay. Median duration of treatment (ICT+local+ACT) was 183 days (range 0-265) in arm A and 139 days (0-226) in arm B. The average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of chemotherapy was 1.3 with a 30% increase in the dose intensity in arm B in comparison with arm A. No difference in clinical [62%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 73.2%] and pathological response rates to ICT was observed between the two arms. Median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-96 months); median disease-free survivals were 4.8 years in arm A and 4.5 years in arm B. Median overall survival was 7.8 years in standard therapy: this figure has not yet been reached in the dose-dense treatment. Conclusions: In LABC a dose-dense regimen, while allowing a 30% increase in the dose intensity of chemotherapy, did not provide significant improvement in pathological response rates. However, accelerated chemotherapy reduced the duration of the combined-modality program (6.1 versus 4.6 months) with no additional toxicities.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 232
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective randomized study of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced or recurrent breast cancer
    Kobayashi T.
    Koyama H.
    Oka T.
    Yasumura T.
    Kan N.
    Takatsuka Y.
    Noguchi M.
    Morimoto K.
    Suzuki T.
    Tobe T.
    Mori T.
    Breast Cancer, 1999, 6 (1) : 37 - 42
  • [2] CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE VERSUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL IN ADVANCED PROSTATIC-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    MUSS, HB
    HOWARD, V
    RICHARDS, F
    WHITE, DR
    JACKSON, DV
    COOPER, MR
    STUART, JJ
    RESNICK, MI
    BRODKIN, R
    SPURR, CL
    CANCER, 1981, 47 (08) : 1949 - 1953
  • [3] COMPARISON OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, ADRIAMYCIN, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL VERSUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL IN METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER
    BULL, J
    TORMEY, D
    FALKSON, G
    BLOM, J
    PERLIN, E
    CARBONE, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH, 1975, 16 (MAR): : 246 - 246
  • [5] CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, 5-FLUOROURACIL VERSUS 5-FLUOROURACIL FOR CARCINOMA OF LARGE-INTESTINE IN ADVANCED PHASE
    SCANNI, A
    TOMIROTTI, M
    BIRAGHI, M
    ANNIBALI, E
    DELBIANCO, S
    MINERVA MEDICA, 1980, 71 (10) : 799 - 801
  • [6] COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY WITH CMF (CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, 5-FLUOROURACIL) VERSUS CNF (MITOXANTRONE, 5-FLUOROURACIL, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE) IN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED STUDY
    LORUSSO, V
    VICI, P
    BIANCO, AR
    LOPEZ, M
    DEPLACIDO, S
    PIANO, A
    PALOMBA, G
    CARLOMAGNO, C
    DAPRILE, M
    FOSSER, V
    BRANDI, M
    DELENA, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 1993, 2 (04) : 531 - 535
  • [7] 5-FLUOROURACIL, ADRIAMYCIN, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE (FAC) VS 5-FLUOROURACIL, EPIRUBICIN, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE (FEC) IN METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER
    LOPEZ, M
    PAPALDO, P
    DILAURO, L
    VICI, P
    CARPANO, S
    CONTI, EMS
    ONCOLOGY, 1989, 46 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [8] A PHASE-III RANDOMIZED TRIAL OC CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, MITOXANTRONE, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL (CNF) VERSUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, ADRIAMYCIN, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL (CAF) IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER
    ALONSO, MC
    TABERNERO, JM
    OJEDA, B
    LLANOS, M
    SOLA, C
    CLIMENT, MA
    SEGUI, MA
    LOPEZ, JJ
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1995, 34 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [9] Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide versus Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and 5-Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Livi, L.
    Saieva, C.
    Borghesi, S.
    Cardillo, C. De Luca
    Scotti, V.
    Mangoni, M.
    Greto, D.
    Cataliotti, L.
    Paiar, F.
    Bianchi, S.
    Biti, G. P.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 21 (05) : 558 - 565
  • [10] CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE (C) VERSUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE (M) AND 5-FLUOROURACIL (F) IN ADVANCED PROSTATIC-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    RESNICK, MI
    MUSS, HB
    HOWARD, G
    RICHARDS, F
    WHITE, DR
    STUART, JJ
    SPURR, CL
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH, 1980, 21 (MAR): : 135 - 135