Explaining green technology purchases by US and Canadian households: the role of pro-environmental lifestyles, values, and environmental concern

被引:23
作者
Caggiano, Holly Berman [1 ]
Kumar, Pranay [1 ]
Shwom, Rachael [2 ]
Cuite, Cara [2 ]
Axsen, Jonn [3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Edward J Bloustein Sch Planning & Publ Policy, New Brunswick, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Human Ecol, Sch Environm & Biol Sci, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Management, Burnaby, BC, Canada
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Consumption; Sustainability; Lifestyles; Values; ENERGY-EFFICIENCY; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; MODEL; CONSUMPTION; IDENTITY; POLICIES; APPLIANCES; INNOVATION; ATTITUDES; CONSUMERS;
D O I
10.1007/s12053-021-09959-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Household energy consumption is a significant driver of greenhouse gas emissions associated with global climate change. Thus, identifying social and psychological determinants of household-level consumption warrants further study. Using nationally representative samples from Canada (N = 1220) and the USA (N = 1001), we examine the impact of three categories of behavioral antecedents on decision to purchase energy-efficient technology: values, environmental concern, and lifestyle orientation. Green lifestyle orientation refers to the importance of environmental action to one's overall lifestyle, a theory that has been primarily explained through qualitative methods. We report three key findings comparing US and Canadian green technology purchasing intentions. The results of three structural equation models suggest the presence of a relationship between biospheric and altruistic values, environmental concern, and green lifestyle orientation that predict green technology purchasing intention in both samples. Additionally, income has a strong effect on purchase intentions in both US and Canadian consumers. Other sociodemographic factors also influence potential purchases and identifying as female was positively related to electric vehicle purchase intention in the US sample, but this relationship did not hold in the Canadian sample. We suggest that future research continue to explore pro-environmental behaviors not in isolation, but as integrated within broader green lifestyle perceptions and contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation [J].
Abrahamse, W ;
Steg, L ;
Vlek, C ;
Rothengatter, T .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) :273-291
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]   Social norms and energy conservation [J].
Allcott, Hunt .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2011, 95 (9-10) :1082-1095
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, World Energy Outlook 2015, DOI [DOI 10.1787/WEO-2015-EN, 10.1787/weo-2015-en]
[5]   Merging Theory of Planned Behavior and Value Identity Personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors [J].
Ates, Huseyin .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2020, 24 :169-180
[7]   Lifestyle practices and pro-environmental technology [J].
Axsen, Jonn ;
TyreeHageman, Jennifer ;
Lentz, Andy .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 82 :64-74
[8]  
Babbie Earl., 2013, BASICS SOCIAL RES
[9]   The household energy gap: examining the divide between habitual- and purchase-related conservation behaviours [J].
Barr, S ;
Gilg, AW ;
Ford, N .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (11) :1425-1444
[10]   The activation of environmental norms - Extending Schwartz's model [J].
Blamey, R .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 30 (05) :676-708