The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business

被引:127
作者
Harper, Joyce C. [1 ]
Kennett, Debbie [2 ]
Reisel, Dan [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Womens Hlth, Embryol IVF & Reprod Genet Grp, London, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Genet Evolut & Environm, London, England
[3] UCL, Inst Womens Hlth, Ctr Eth Womens Hlth, London, England
关键词
gamete donation; donor conception; anonymity; genetic testing; disclosure; FOLLOW-UP; DISCLOSURE DECISIONS; FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS; CHILD ADJUSTMENT; SPERM; INSEMINATION; CONCEPTION; PARENTS; REPRODUCTION; ADOLESCENCE;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dew065
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Thousands of people worldwide have been conceived using donor gametes, but not all parents tell their children of their origin. Several countries now allow donor-conceived offspring to potentially know their genetic parent if they are informed of their donor-conceived status. At the same time, personal genetic testing is a rapidly expanding field. Over 3 million people have already used direct-to-consumer genetic testing to find information about their ancestry, and many are participating in international genetic genealogy databases that will match them with relatives. The increased prevalence of these technologies poses numerous challenges to the current practice of gamete donation. (i) Whether they are donating in a country that practices anonymous donation or not, donors should be informed that their anonymity is not guaranteed, as they may be traced if their DNA, or that of a relative, is added to a database. (ii) Donor-conceived adults who have not been informed of their status may find out that they are donor-conceived. (iii) Parents using donor conception need to be fully informed that their children's DNA will identify that they are not the biological parents and they should be encouraged to disclose the use of donor gametes to their children. Together, these concerns make urgent a wide-ranging societal conversation about how to best safeguard and promote the interests of donor-conceived offspring and protect the rights of donors. Specifically, there is a need to ensure that new genetic information is communicated in a way that promotes both the safety and the privacy rights of offspring and donors alike. All parties concerned must be aware that, in 2016, donor anonymity does not exist.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1140
页数:6
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Eyes wide open: the personal genome project, citizen science and veracity in informed consent [J].
Angrist, Misha .
PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2009, 6 (06) :691-699
[2]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, NY TIMES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, SLATE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, NEW SCI
[6]  
Australian Broadcasting Corporation RN network, 2015, RN NETWORK 1206
[7]   Parent psychological adjustment, donor conception and disclosure: a follow-up over 10 years [J].
Blake, L. ;
Jadva, V. ;
Golombok, S. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (11) :2487-2496
[8]  
Bonnici T., 2014, TIMES
[9]   Anonymity 2.0: direct-to-consumer genetic testing and donor conception [J].
Borry, Pascal ;
Rusu, Olivia ;
Dondorp, Wybo ;
De Wert, Guido ;
Knoppers, Bartha Maria ;
Howard, Heidi Carmen .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (03) :630-632
[10]   Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients' choices [J].
Brewaeys, A ;
de Bruyn, JK ;
Louwe, LA ;
Helmerhorst, FM .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) :820-824