Intrathecal morphine versus transversus abdominis plane block for caesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Yang, Tao-ran [1 ]
He, Xue-mei [1 ]
Li, Xue-han [1 ]
Wang, Ru-rong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, West China Hosp,Res Units West China 2018RU12, 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Intrathecal morphine; Transversus abdominis plane block; Caesarean delivery; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; SUBARACHNOID MORPHINE; BREAST-MILK; OPIOIDS; EFFICACY; SECTION; PAIN;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-021-01392-9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The number of caesarean deliveries has been increasing. Although intrathecal morphine (ITM) can relieve pain and is widely applied in caesarean deliveries, it is associated with many side effects. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), a new analgesic technology, has also began playing a certain role after caesarean delivery, with fewer adverse effects. This study mainly compares the analgesic and adverse effects of ITM and TAPB in caesarean delivery. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published before 9 October, 2020 to compare the effects of ITM and TAPB. Primary outcome of the study was the pain score at rest 24 h after caesarean delivery, whereas the secondary outcomes were the pain score at movement 24 h after operation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), itching, and morphine consumption. For the outcome assessment, we conducted a sensitivity analysis. Result: Six RCTs involving 563 patients and meeting the study inclusion criteria were included in this study. Results indicated no significant difference in the pain score between ITM and TAPB at 24 h of rest or movement. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that the resting pain score (95% CI = - 1.27 to - 0.28; P = 0.002) and 24-h moving pain score (95% CI = - 1.8 to - 0.07; P = 0.03) of the ITM group were lower than those of the TAPB group. The consumption of morphine in the ITM group was lower than in the TAPB group (95% CI = 1.92 to 4.87; P < 0.00001); however, in terms of adverse reactions, the incidence of pruritus (95% CI = 1.17 to 8.26; P = 0.02) and PONV (95% CI = 1.92 to 4.87, P < 0.00001) in the ITM group was higher than in the TAPB group. Conclusion: Parturients in the ITM and TAPB groups exhibited similar analgesic effects. However, in the sensitivity analysis performed by eliminating the studies causing heterogeneity, the ITM group was found to have superior analgesic effects compared with the TAPB group, with less morphine consumption. Differently, the TAPB group displayed less side effects such as PONV. Therefore, TAPB is still a valuable analgesia option for patients who cannot use ITM for analgesia after caesarean delivery or those having a high risk of PONV.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [11] Subarachnoid morphine versus TAP blocks for enhanced recovery after caesarean section delivery: A randomized controlled trial
    Jarraya, Anouar
    Zghal, Jamil
    Abidi, Sofiene
    Smaoui, Mohamed
    Kolsi, Kamel
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (06) : 401 - 403
  • [12] The Analgesic Efficacy of Subarachnoid Morphine in Comparison with Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kanazi, Ghassan E.
    Aouad, Marie T.
    Abdallah, Faraj W.
    Khatib, Mohamad I.
    Adham, Al Moataz Billah F.
    Harfoush, Diala W.
    Siddik-Sayyid, Sahar M.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (02) : 475 - 481
  • [13] The analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine in comparison with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial at a Ugandan regional referral hospital
    Kwikiriza, A.
    Kiwanuka, J. K.
    Firth, P. G.
    Hoeft, M. A.
    Modest, V. E.
    Ttendo, S. S.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 74 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [14] Postoperative pain management, in obstetric anesthesia - New challenges and solutions
    Leung, AY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2004, 16 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [15] Lim Y., 2005, SMJ Singapore Medical Journal, V46, P392
  • [16] Effects of peripperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery
    Liu, SS
    Block, BM
    Wu, CL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (01) : 153 - 161
  • [17] A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia
    Loane, H.
    Preston, R.
    Douglas, M. J.
    Massey, S.
    Papsdorf, M.
    Tyler, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 21 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [18] The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial
    McDonnell, John G.
    Curley, Gerard
    Carney, John
    Benton, Aoife
    Costello, Joseph
    Maharaj, Chrisen H.
    Laffey, John G.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (01) : 186 - 191
  • [19] Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal morphine for pain relief after Caesarean section
    McMorrow, R. C. N.
    Mhuircheartaigh, R. J. Ni
    Ahmed, K. A.
    Aslani, A.
    Ng, S. -C.
    Conrick-Martin, I.
    Dowling, J. J.
    Gaffney, A.
    Loughrey, J. P. R.
    McCaul, C. L.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (05) : 706 - 712
  • [20] Mishriky BM, 2012, CAN J ANESTH, V59, P766, DOI 10.1007/s12630-012-9729-1