Intrathecal morphine versus transversus abdominis plane block for caesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Yang, Tao-ran [1 ]
He, Xue-mei [1 ]
Li, Xue-han [1 ]
Wang, Ru-rong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, West China Hosp,Res Units West China 2018RU12, 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Intrathecal morphine; Transversus abdominis plane block; Caesarean delivery; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; SUBARACHNOID MORPHINE; BREAST-MILK; OPIOIDS; EFFICACY; SECTION; PAIN;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-021-01392-9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The number of caesarean deliveries has been increasing. Although intrathecal morphine (ITM) can relieve pain and is widely applied in caesarean deliveries, it is associated with many side effects. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), a new analgesic technology, has also began playing a certain role after caesarean delivery, with fewer adverse effects. This study mainly compares the analgesic and adverse effects of ITM and TAPB in caesarean delivery. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published before 9 October, 2020 to compare the effects of ITM and TAPB. Primary outcome of the study was the pain score at rest 24 h after caesarean delivery, whereas the secondary outcomes were the pain score at movement 24 h after operation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), itching, and morphine consumption. For the outcome assessment, we conducted a sensitivity analysis. Result: Six RCTs involving 563 patients and meeting the study inclusion criteria were included in this study. Results indicated no significant difference in the pain score between ITM and TAPB at 24 h of rest or movement. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that the resting pain score (95% CI = - 1.27 to - 0.28; P = 0.002) and 24-h moving pain score (95% CI = - 1.8 to - 0.07; P = 0.03) of the ITM group were lower than those of the TAPB group. The consumption of morphine in the ITM group was lower than in the TAPB group (95% CI = 1.92 to 4.87; P < 0.00001); however, in terms of adverse reactions, the incidence of pruritus (95% CI = 1.17 to 8.26; P = 0.02) and PONV (95% CI = 1.92 to 4.87, P < 0.00001) in the ITM group was higher than in the TAPB group. Conclusion: Parturients in the ITM and TAPB groups exhibited similar analgesic effects. However, in the sensitivity analysis performed by eliminating the studies causing heterogeneity, the ITM group was found to have superior analgesic effects compared with the TAPB group, with less morphine consumption. Differently, the TAPB group displayed less side effects such as PONV. Therefore, TAPB is still a valuable analgesia option for patients who cannot use ITM for analgesia after caesarean delivery or those having a high risk of PONV.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] The Analgesic Efficacy of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block versus Epidural Block after Caesarean Delivery: Which One Is Effective? TAP Block? Epidural Block?
    Canakci, Ebru
    Gultekin, Ahmet
    Cebeci, Zubeyir
    Hanedan, Bulent
    Kilinc, Anil
    [J]. PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 2018
  • [2] Respiratory depression after neuraxial opioids in the obstetric setting
    Carvalho, Brendan
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (03) : 956 - 961
  • [3] The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations for Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Guidance for Improving Safety and Mitigating Risks
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Pope, Jason E.
    Hayek, Salim M.
    Lamer, Tim J.
    Veizi, Ilir Elias
    Erdek, Michael
    Wallace, Mark S.
    Grider, Jay S.
    Levy, Robert M.
    Prager, Joshua
    Rosen, Steven M.
    Saulino, Michael
    Yaksh, Tony L.
    De Andres, Jose A.
    Abejon Gonzalez, David
    Vesper, Jan
    Schu, Stefan
    Simpson, Brian
    Mekhail, Nagy
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (02): : 155 - 176
  • [4] The impact of a transversus abdominis plane block including clonidine vs. intrathecal morphine on nausea and vomiting after caesarean section A randomised controlled trial
    Dereu, Domitille
    Savoldelli, Georges L.
    Mercier, Yannick
    Combescure, Christophe
    Mathivon, Stanislas
    Rehberg, Benno
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (08) : 575 - 582
  • [5] Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression
    Eisenach, James C.
    Pan, Peter H.
    Smilley, Richard
    Lavand'homme, Patricia
    Landau, Ruth
    Houle, Timothy T.
    [J]. PAIN, 2008, 140 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [6] PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA FOLLOWING CESAREAN-SECTION - A COMPARISON WITH EPIDURAL AND INTRAMUSCULAR NARCOTICS
    EISENACH, JC
    GRICE, SC
    DEWAN, DM
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 68 (03) : 444 - 448
  • [7] Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
    Higgins, JPT
    Thompson, SG
    Deeks, JJ
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414): : 557 - 560
  • [8] The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Jueni, Peter
    Moher, David
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Savovic, Jelena
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Weeks, Laura
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
  • [9] Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
    Hozo S.P.
    Djulbegovic B.
    Hozo I.
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5 (1)
  • [10] Opioids in Breast Milk: Pharmacokinetic Principles and Clinical Implications
    Ito, Shinya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 58 (10) : S151 - S163