Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China's Eight ETS Pilots

被引:21
作者
Chai, Shanglei [1 ]
Sun, Ruixuan [1 ]
Zhang, Ke [1 ]
Ding, Yueting [2 ]
Wei, Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Business Sch, Jinan 250358, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Ctr Energy Environm & Econ Res, Sch Management, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
environmental regulation policy; carbon emissions reduction effect; emission trading scheme (ETS); policy evaluation; difference-in-differences (DID); data envelopment analysis (DEA); CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; IMPACT; REDUCTION; GAINS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19063177
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change and environmental issues caused by carbon emissions have attracted the attention of governments around the world. Drawing on the experience of the EU, China is actively developing a national carbon emissions trading market, trying to encourage emission entities to incorporate carbon emissions reduction into production and consumption decisions through carbon pricing. Is this scheme an effective market-incentivized environmental regulatory policy? Since China successively launched ETS pilots in 2013, the effectiveness of reducing carbon emissions has become one of the current focus issues. This study uses the difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the impact of ETS implementation on emissions reduction and employs the Super-SBM model in data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the emission-reduction efficiency of eight ETS pilots in China. We find that the carbon trading policy has achieved emission-reduction effects in the implementation stage, and the greenness of economic growth has a significant positive impact on regional GDP. The establishment of China's unified carbon market should be coordinated with regional development. Some supporting measures for regional ecological compensation and the mitigation of regional development are yet to be adopted.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Measuring Dynamic Energy Efficiency in Africa: A Slack-Based DEA Approach [J].
Amowine, Nelson ;
Ma, Zhiqiang ;
Li, Mingxing ;
Zhou, Zhixiang ;
Yaw Naminse, Eric ;
Amowine, James .
ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (11) :3854-3865
[2]   Applying environmental Kuznets curve framework to assess the nexus of industry, globalization, and CO2 emission [J].
Aslam, Bilal ;
Hu, Jinsong ;
Hafeez, Muhammad ;
Ma, Deqing ;
AlGarni, Tahani Saad ;
Saeed, Muhammad ;
Abdullah, Muhammad Arslan ;
Hussain, Shahid .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2021, 21
[3]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[4]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[5]   Towards carbon neutrality by implementing carbon emissions trading scheme: Policy evaluation in China [J].
Chen, Xing ;
Lin, Boqiang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 157
[6]  
Cheng Y, 2017, SCI TECHNOL MANAG RE, V37, P96
[7]   Recognition and analysis of potential risks in China's carbon emission trading markets [J].
Deng Mao-Zhi ;
Zhang Wen-Xiu .
ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2019, 10 (01) :30-46
[8]   Can a carbon emission trading scheme generate the Porter effect? Evidence from pilot areas in China [J].
Dong, Feng ;
Dai, Yuanju ;
Zhang, Shengnan ;
Zhang, Xiaoyun ;
Long, Ruyin .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 653 :565-577
[9]   Multifractality and market efficiency of carbon emission trading market: Analysis using the multifractal detrended fluctuation technique [J].
Fan, Xinghua ;
Lv, Xiangxiang ;
Yin, Jiuli ;
Tian, Lixin ;
Liang, Jiaochen .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 251
[10]   Evaluation of effectiveness of China's carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation [J].
Gao, Yuning ;
Li, Meng ;
Xue, Jinjun ;
Liu, Yu .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 90