Are Online Patient Reviews Associated With Health Care Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Literature

被引:13
作者
Placona, Andrew M. [1 ]
Rathert, Cheryl [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
online patient reviews; patient experience; patient satisfaction; patient outcomes; patient safety; PHYSICIAN REVIEWS; RATINGS; QUALITY; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCE; HOSPITALS; SURGEONS; TRUST; COST;
D O I
10.1177/10775587211014534
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Although online patient reviews (OPRs) are ubiquitous, there has been debate about whether OPRs are associated with measures of health care outcomes. The majority of patients search for online information about a hospital or provider before scheduling an encounter, therefore, the extent to which OPRs are valid information is important. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine the extent to which OPRs are associated with measures of patient experience, clinical quality, and other outcomes. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo, which yielded 32 studies. There were consistent positive correlations between OPRs and patient experience at both the organization and individual provider levels of analysis. However, associations between OPRs and quality measures were mixed. Organizational level OPRs may be more reliable than individual provider OPRs. In addition, the strength of association could be affected by the type of encounter setting, specialty, and specific measures.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 16
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   CAN PATIENTS RELY ON RESULTS OF PHYSICIAN RATING WEBSITES WHEN SELECTING A PHYSICIAN? - A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ASSESSING THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ONLINE RATINGS AND STRUCTURAL AND QUALITY OF CARE MEASURES FROM TWO GERMAN PHYSICIAN RATING WEBSITES [J].
Adelhardt, T. ;
Emmert, M. ;
Sander, U. ;
Wambach, V ;
Lindenthal, J. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) :A545-A545
[2]  
American Medical Association, COD MED ETH PAT PHYS
[3]  
American Occupational Therapy Association, 2018, 5 THINGS PAT PROV SH
[4]   Letter to the Editor in response to "Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review" [J].
Bardach, Naomi S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (06) :744-745
[5]   Raising up the voices of the closest observers of care [J].
Bardach, Naomi S. .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2018, 27 (02) :96-98
[6]   The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA [J].
Bardach, Naomi S. ;
Asteria-Penaloza, Renee ;
Boscardin, W. John ;
Dudley, R. Adams .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (03) :194-202
[7]  
Becker's Hospital Review, 2017, 1 IMPR ONL AFF PAT A
[8]  
Bialik C., 2017, YELP OFFICIAL BLOG
[9]   Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians [J].
Burkle, Christopher M. ;
Keegan, Mark T. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
[10]   Are Facebook user ratings associated with hospital cost, quality and patient satisfaction? A cross-sectional analysis of hospitals in New York State [J].
Campbell, Lauren ;
Li, Yue .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2018, 27 (02) :119-129