Characteristics of Engineering Faculty Engaged in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Bielefeldt, Angela R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2015 | 2015年
关键词
engineering faculty; demographics; disciplines; service-learning; ethics; design; culture; EDUCATION; WOMEN; CULTURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This research hypothesized that differences in the culture of engineering education as it is practiced a whole, as compared to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) in engineering education, would manifest themselves through the characteristics of the faculty engaging in these activities. The research question examined was: To what extent are the faculty who engage in different areas of SoTL research within engineering similar to or different than the engineering faculty at U.S. institutions overall? The research utilized a data mining approach, assuming that the authors of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference papers would characterize engineering faculty engaged in SoTL. The demographic characteristics of the authors of ASEE papers published in 2012-2014 on the topics of Learning Through Service (LTS), engineering ethics, and design were determined, as well as the authors of papers in the civil engineering, environmental engineering, and electrical & computer engineering divisions. The demographic characteristics of engineering faculty nationally were mined from ASEE data sources. The primary differences between engineering faculty active in SoTL compared to overall U.S. engineering faculty were: a higher percentage of assistant professors, a lower percentage of full professors, a higher percentage of women, a higher percentage employed at Baccalaureate or Master's institutions, and a smaller percentage from institutions with very high research activity. Between different engineering education topics, the primary differences were in the engineering disciplines represented, the percentage of women among the authors, and collaboration patterns evident among the paper coauthors. These data indicate the ways in which engineering faculty active in SoTL are different than their engineering faculty peers overall, and also highlights differences among engineering education topics. Further exploration is needed to determine the extent to which these differences are the result of different cultural values within each group.
引用
收藏
页码:1146 / 1153
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Engineering Deans' Perspectives on the Current State of Faculty Development Programs in Engineering Education
    Huerta, Mark
    London, Jeremi
    Mckenna, Ann
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2022, 38 (04) : 1073 - 1091
  • [32] Australian and Aotearoa Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Criminology: A Scoping Review
    Burns, Kate Hutton
    Loney-Howes, Rachel
    Wood, Mark A.
    Iliadis, Mary
    JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE EDUCATION, 2024, 35 (01) : 56 - 76
  • [33] Turn! Turn! Turn!: A time for engaged learning. The engagement of scholarship and practice in a classroom setting
    Knassmueller, Monika
    TEACHING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 34 (01) : 19 - 39
  • [34] The scholarship of teaching and learning in public administration: An agenda for future research
    Mcdonald, Bruce D.
    Hatcher, William
    Bacot, Hunter
    Evans, Michelle D.
    Mccandless, Sean A.
    Mcdougle, Lindsey M.
    Young, Sarah L.
    Elliott, Ian C.
    Emas, Rachel
    Lu, Elaine Yi
    Abbott, Michaela E.
    Bearfield, Domonic A.
    Berry-James, RaJade M.
    Blessett, Brandi
    Borry, Erin L.
    Diamond, John
    Franklin, Amiee L.
    Gaynor, Tia Sheree
    Gong, Ting
    Goodman, Doug
    Guy, Mary E.
    Hall, Jeremy L.
    Hatch, Megan
    Jin, Myung H.
    Jordan, Meagan M.
    Levine Daniel, Jamie
    Love, Jeannine M.
    Maher, Craig S.
    Menifield, Charles
    O'Flynn, Janine
    O'Leary, Rosemary
    Liu, Peng
    Pliscoff, Cristian
    Puron-Cid, Gabriel
    Rinfret, Sara R.
    Sowa, Jessica E.
    Stazyk, Edmund C.
    Stewart, Kendra
    Torneo, Ador R.
    Wiley, Kimberly K.
    Zhang, Yahong
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION, 2024, 30 (01) : 11 - 27
  • [35] Supporting Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Public Health: An Ecosystem Approach
    Kruger, Jessica S.
    Godley, Sophie
    Neubauer, Leah C.
    PEDAGOGY IN HEALTH PROMOTION, 2025,
  • [36] Utilizing the scholarship of teaching and learning to design an Anatomy Pedagogy Course
    Balta, Joy Y.
    O'Keeffe, Gerard W.
    Supple, Briony
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2019, 23 (03) : 233 - 240
  • [37] Scholarship in Teaching: An Approach to Enhancing the Value and Academic Standing of Teaching
    Papp, K. K.
    Altose, M. D.
    Wilson-Delfosse, A. L.
    Thomas, P. A.
    MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2020, 30 (04) : 1585 - 1590
  • [38] Teaching Software Engineering in Blended Learning
    Bhattacharya, Sharbani
    2012 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIVE COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (ICL), 2012,
  • [39] TEACHING IS LEARNING: EXPLORING FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF FIRST-TIME ONLINE COURSE DEVELOPMENT
    Plews, R.
    Bonvin, M.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 6488 - 6494
  • [40] Learning and Teaching Engineering Courses with Visualizations
    Nguyen, Tang-Hung
    Khoo, I-Hung
    WCECS 2009: WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 580 - +