Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis

被引:76
作者
Wang, Hao [1 ]
Zhao, Yizhu [1 ]
Gao, Xichen [1 ]
Gao, Boyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Urban regeneration; Collaborative decision-making; Stakeholders; Review; Bibliometric analysis; SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION; RENEWAL PROJECTS; HISTORIC CENTER; ADAPTIVE REUSE; HONG-KONG; PARTICIPATION; MODEL; NEIGHBORHOOD; GOVERNANCE; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105479
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since the diverse interests of multiple stakeholders inevitably increase the complexity of urban regeneration projects, collaborative decision-making has gradually been regarded as a solution to such a challenging problem. Although existing studies have begun to pay attention to the issue of collaborative decision-making between various stakeholders in urban regeneration, some problems e.g., inappropriate collaborative strategies, unreasonable distribution mechanism for stakeholders' interests, have yet to be solved and the research is still in the early stage. To better guide the investigation in this area, a comprehensive and systematic review for the existing studies is necessary. Using bibliometric approach, this paper classifies 160 journal papers related to decisionmaking in urban regeneration into three categories: (1) policies and strategies, (2) stakeholders, and (3) approaches and tools. Followed by a critical review to identify limitations of current research and future research directions. Finally, constructive suggestions and implications for collaborative decision-making in urban regeneration are provided, in terms of policy formulation, stakeholder coordination, and development of decision support tools. This review paper can be used as a roadmap for global researchers who focus on collaborative decision-making in urban regeneration, which could assist in the formulation of appropriate policies and the development of reliable decision-making toolkits.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Decision-Making Tool for Participatory Urban Planning and Development: Residents' Preferences of Their Built Environment [J].
Abdalla, Sahar S. ;
Elariane, Sarah A. ;
El Defrawi, Sarah H. .
JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 142 (01)
[2]   Urban renewal in Hong Kong: transition from development corporation to renewal authority [J].
Adams, D ;
Hastings, EM .
LAND USE POLICY, 2001, 18 (03) :245-258
[3]   A performance-based framework to prioritise underutilised historical buildings for adaptive reuse interventions in New Zealand [J].
Aigwi, Itohan Esther ;
Egbelakin, Temitope ;
Ingham, Jason ;
Phipps, Robyn ;
Rotimi, James ;
Filippova, Olga .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 48
[4]   The Governance of Urban Upgrading in Southern China The Example of Urbanized Villages [J].
Altrock, Uwe ;
Schoon, Sonia .
DISP, 2011, 47 (04) :37-48
[5]   Challenges to urban cultural heritage conservation and management in the historic centre of Sulaimaniyah, Kurdistan-Iraq [J].
Amin, Hanaw M. Taqi M. ;
Adu-Ampong, Emmanuel Akwasi .
JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 6 (03) :255-270
[6]  
Amore A, 2017, LOCAL ECON, V32, P617, DOI 10.1177/0269094217734326
[7]   Social mix, '[A] very, very good idea in a vacuum but you have to do it properly!' Exploring social mix in a right to the city framework [J].
Arthurson, Kathy ;
Levin, Iris ;
Ziersch, Anna .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOUSING POLICY, 2015, 15 (04) :418-435
[8]   Evaluation of the Criteria for Designating Maintenance Districts in Low-Rise Residential Areas: Urban Renewal Projects in Seoul [J].
Bae, Woongkyoo ;
Kim, UnHyo ;
Lee, Jeongwoo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)
[9]   Autocratic urban design - The case of the Navab Regeneration Project in central Tehran [J].
Bahrainy, Hossein ;
Aminzadeh, Behnaz .
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING REVIEW, 2007, 29 (02) :241-270
[10]  
Bottero M, 2017, TEMA, V10, P193, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/5163