Validated algorithms for identifying timing of second event of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using real-world data

被引:1
作者
Khair, Shahreen [1 ]
Dort, Joseph C. [1 ,2 ]
Quan, May Lynn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cheung, Winson Y. [1 ,2 ]
Sauro, Khara M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nakoneshny, Steven C. [4 ]
Popowich, Brittany Lynn [5 ]
Liu, Ping [1 ]
Wu, Guosong [1 ,5 ]
Xu, Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Surg, Foothills Med Ctr, North Tower, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Canc Ctr, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Arnie Charbonneau Canc Inst, Ohlson Res Initiat, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Ctr Hlth Informat, Teaching Res & Wellness TRW, Calgary, AB, Canada
来源
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK | 2022年 / 44卷 / 08期
关键词
algorithm validation; cancer second event; chart review; oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; real-world data; ADMINISTRATIVE DATA; CANCER; RECURRENCE; PREDICTION; ASCERTAIN; SURVIVAL; ALBERTA; NECK; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/hed.27109
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background Understanding occurrence and timing of second events (recurrence and second primary cancer) is essential for cancer specific survival analysis. However, this information is not readily available in administrative data. Methods Alberta Cancer Registry, physician claims, and other administrative data were used. Timing of second event was estimated based on our developed algorithm. For validation, the difference, in days between the algorithm estimated and the chart-reviewed timing of second event. Further, the result of Cox-regression modeling cancer-free survival was compared to chart review data. Results Majority (74.3%) of the patients had a difference between the chart-reviewed and algorithm-estimated timing of second event falling within the 0-60 days window. Kaplan-Meier curves generated from the estimated data and chart review data were comparable with a 5-year second-event-free survival rate of 75.4% versus 72.5%. Conclusion The algorithm provided an estimated timing of second event similar to that of the chart review.
引用
收藏
页码:1909 / 1917
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
A'mar T, 2020, JMIR CANCER, V6, DOI 10.2196/18143
[2]  
Achilonu OJ., 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9
[3]  
Alberta Health Services, 2021, ALB CANC REG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, NATIONAL AMBULATORY CARE REPORTING SYSTEM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, DISCH ABSTR DAT MET
[6]  
[Anonymous], CART
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SAS 9 4
[8]   Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data [J].
Benchimol, Eric I. ;
Manuel, Douglas G. ;
To, Teresa ;
Griffiths, Anne M. ;
Rabeneck, Linda ;
Guttmann, Astrid .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (08) :821-829
[9]   Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis [J].
Bujang, Mohamad Adam ;
Adnan, Tassha Hilda .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (10) :YE1-YE6
[10]   Validation in Alberta of an administrative data algorithm to identify cancer recurrence [J].
Cairncross, Z. F. ;
Nelson, G. ;
Shack, L. ;
Metcalfe, A. .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (03) :E343-E346