Differed service broker scheduling for data centres in cloud environment

被引:3
作者
Valarmathi, R. [1 ,2 ]
Sheela, T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sathyabama Inst Sci & Technol, Fac CSE, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Sri Sairam Engn Coll, Dept CSE, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Sri Sairam Engn Coll, Dept Informat Technol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Service broker; Cloud environment; Quality of service; Data centres and latency; VIRTUAL MACHINE PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.comcom.2019.08.007
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The cloud computing is based on pay as you use computing resources for controlling diverse services like a server, storage and applications. The applications and models are offered in terms of pay per usage using the data centre to the users. The data centres are positioned globally and moreover, these data centres could be overloaded with the increased number of client applications that are being serviced at the identical time and position which corrupts the comprehensive quality of service of the relayed services. Diverse user applications might need diverse customization and demands calibrating the performance of the user applications at differed resources are quite intricate. The service supplier is incapable of performing choices for the suitable set of resources. The design of differed service broker forwarding strategies is based on placing the submitted task in the datacenter with minimum path length and least loaded. The main objective is to accomplish minimal reply time based on the transmission medium, bandwidth, latencies and task size. The designed service broker strategy attempts in minimizing the overpopulated data centres by conveying the user demand to the subsequent data centres that obtain improved reply and processing time. The analysis reveals potential outcomes in terms of reply and processing time as estimated to the other existing broker strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 191
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, P 2009 IEEE INT PAR, DOI DOI 10.1109/IPDPS.2009.5161067
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag, DOI DOI 10.1109/TNSM.2007.021103
[3]   Data Center Network Virtualization: A Survey [J].
Bari, Md. Faizul ;
Boutaba, Raouf ;
Esteves, Rafael ;
Granville, Lisandro Zambenedetti ;
Podlesny, Maxim ;
Rabbani, Md Golam ;
Zhang, Qi ;
Zhani, Mohamed Faten .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2013, 15 (02) :909-928
[4]  
Benlalia Zakaria, 2019, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI
[5]   CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms [J].
Calheiros, Rodrigo N. ;
Ranjan, Rajiv ;
Beloglazov, Anton ;
De Rose, Cesar A. F. ;
Buyya, Rajkumar .
SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2011, 41 (01) :23-50
[6]  
Chen KY, 2013, IEEE ICC, P3498, DOI 10.1109/ICC.2013.6655092
[7]   Resource Allocation for Distributed Cloud: Concepts and Research Challenges [J].
Endo, Patricia Takako ;
de Almeida Palhares, Andre Vitor ;
Pereira, Nadilma Nunes ;
Goncalves, Glauco Estacio ;
Sadok, Djamel ;
Kelner, Judith ;
Melander, Bob ;
Mangs, Jan-Erik .
IEEE NETWORK, 2011, 25 (04) :42-46
[8]  
Esteves RP, 2013, 2013 IFIP/IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATED NETWORK MANAGEMENT (IM 2013), P169
[9]  
Foster G, 2013, 2013 IFIP/IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATED NETWORK MANAGEMENT (IM 2013), P151
[10]  
Houidi Ines, 2011 IEEE INT C SERV