The real cost of training health professionals in Australia: it costs as much to build a dietician workforce as a dental workforce

被引:17
作者
Segal, Leonie [1 ]
Marsh, Claire [1 ]
Heyes, Rob [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Ctr Populat Hlth Res, Hlth Econ & Social Policy Grp, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
cost; health workforce; multidisciplinary care/primary care; training; POLICY; CARE;
D O I
10.1177/1355819616668202
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: We explored the real cost of training the workforce in a range of primary health care professions in Australia with a focus on the impact of retention to contribute to the debate on how best to achieve the optimal health workforce mix. Methods: The cost to train an entry-level health professional across 12 disciplines was derived from university fees, payment for clinical placements and, where relevant, cost of internship, adjusted for student drop-out. Census data were used to identify the number of qualified professionals working in their profession over a working life and to model expected years of practice by discipline. Data were combined to estimate the mean cost of training a health professional per year of service in their occupation. Results: General medical graduates were the most expensive to train at $ 451,000 per completing student and a mean cost of $ 18,400 per year of practice (expected 24.5 years in general practice), while dentistry also had a high training cost of $ 352,180 but an estimated costs of $ 11,140 per year of practice (based on an expected 31.6 years in practice). Training costs are similar for dieticians and podiatrists, but because of differential workforce retention (mean 14.9 vs 31.5 years), the cost of training per year of clinical practice is twice as high for dieticians ($ 10,300 vs. $ 5200), only 8% lower than that for dentistry. Conclusions: Return on investment in training across professions is highly variable, with expected time in the profession as important as the direct training cost. These results can indicate where increased retention and/or attracting trained professionals to return to practice should be the focus of any supply expansion versus increasing the student cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, AUSTRALIAS HLTH WORK
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIN TRAIN 2013
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HLTH WORKF 2025 DOCT
[4]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, LIF EXP
[5]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2015, CENS POP HOUS
[6]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2015, TABL BUILD ONL DAT A
[7]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012, 2011 NONR FACT SHEET
[8]  
Australian Government Department of Education and Training, 2015, STUD GRAD TABL DER H
[9]  
Australian Government Department of Health, 2015, NAT HLTH WORKF DAT
[10]  
Australian Health Workforce Advisory Committee, 2006, AUSTR ALL HLTH WORKP