An interpersonal circumplex/five-factor analysis of the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire

被引:46
|
作者
Brookings, JB
Zembar, MJ
Hochstetler, GM
机构
[1] Wittenberg Univ, Dept Psychol, Springfield, OH 45501 USA
[2] Univ Dayton, Dept Psychol, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
rejection sensitivity; validation; interpersonal circumplex; five-factor model;
D O I
10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00065-X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Rejection sensitive persons expect others to reject them, readily interpret ambiguous interpersonal cues as rejection, and overreact to rejection, real or imagined (Downey & Feldman, 1996). Rejection sensitivity-as assessed by the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (RSQ)-is psychologically distressing and predicts relationship problems, but questions remain about the measurement properties of the RSQ. For this study, the interpersonal circumplex and five-factor models provided the framework for a comprehensive mapping of rejection sensitivity in the personality domain. College students completed the RSQ, the Interpersonal Adjective Scales Revised-Big Five (Trapnell & Wiggins, 1990), and measures of theoretically relevant constructs. The RSQ had significant interpersonal content, as expected, its angular placement was between IASR-135 octant scales HI (Unassured-Submissive) and FG (Aloof-Introverted), and it was correlated significantly with Neuroticism. It appears, then. that rejection sensitive persons, as identified by the RSQ, are more likely to avoid rejection by distancing themselves from others, rather than by seeking intimate relationships. The RSQ has adequate psychometric properties, but valid tests of rejection sensitivity as a variable linking early attachment problems to later rejection-avoidance strategies require the inclusion of additional measures. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 461
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Translation and Validity of the Malay Version of the Five-Factor Nonverbal Personality Questionnaire (FFNPQ)
    Ab Rashid, N. F.
    Arifin, W. N.
    Kueh, Y. C.
    Yusoff, N.
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL MALAYSIA, 2018, 17 (02) : 91 - 98
  • [32] Procrastination and the five-factor model: a facet level analysis
    Watson, DC
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 30 (01) : 149 - 158
  • [33] Efficacy of iloperidone in schizophrenia: A PANSS five-factor analysis
    Citrome, Leslie
    Meng, Xiangyi
    Hochfeld, Marla
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2011, 131 (1-3) : 75 - 81
  • [34] Creativity and the five-factor model
    King, LA
    Walker, LM
    Broyles, SJ
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1996, 30 (02) : 189 - 203
  • [35] Obtaining and Losing the Bipolarity of the Five-Factor Model Through Factor Analysis
    Crego, Cristina
    Oltmanns, Joshua R.
    Widiger, Thomas A.
    PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 11 (02) : 119 - 130
  • [36] The five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale - I: Confirmatory factor analysis fails to confirm 25 published five-factor solutions
    van der Gaag, Mark
    Cuijpers, Anke
    Hoffman, Tonko
    Remijsen, Mila
    Hijman, Ron
    de Haan, Lieuwe
    van Meijel, Berno
    van Harten, Peter N.
    Valmaggia, Lucia
    de Hert, Marc
    Wiersma, Durk
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2006, 85 (1-3) : 273 - 279
  • [38] Mispricing and the five-factor model
    Walkshaeusl, Christian
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 147 : 99 - 102
  • [39] Examination of the general factor with the interpersonal circumplex structure: Application to the inventory of interpersonal problems
    Tracey, TJG
    Rounds, J
    Gurtman, M
    MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1996, 31 (04) : 441 - 466
  • [40] Features of the application of five-factor personality questionnaire in the activities of psychologists of the bodies of internal affairs
    Petrov, V. E.
    Kokurin, A., V
    PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2016, 6 (03): : 40 - 47