Variation in Schlemm's Canal Diameter and Location by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy

被引:49
作者
Irshad, Farhan A.
Mayfield, Melinda S. [2 ]
Zurakowski, David [3 ,4 ]
Ayyala, Ramesh S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Tulane Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Glaucoma Serv, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] ISci Intervent, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Childrens Hosp Boston, Dept Anesthesiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Childrens Hosp Boston, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
TRABECULAR MESHWORK; ENDOTHELIA; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.041
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To measure variations in diameter and location of Schlemm's canal in vivo by ultrasound biomicroscopy. Design: Prospective, single-institution, consecutive case series. Participants: Ninety-four patients with and without glaucoma. Methods: Under topical anesthesia, an 80-MHz iUltrasound probe (iScience Interventional, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) placed at the 12-o'clock position was used to measure the canal's diameter and its distance from both the anatomic limbus (corneoscleral junction) and the angle ( the base of the canal and the angle of iris insertion). Main Outcome Measures: Diameter and location of the canal were measured relative to gender, age, intraocular pressure, race, diagnosis, previous glaucoma surgery, pachymetry, refraction, lens type, axial length, and keratometry. Results: The average canal diameter was 121 mu m (+/- 45 mu m). The canal diameter in hyperopes was larger than the canal diameter in myopes (180 +/- 69 mu m vs. 122 +/- 45 mu m; P<0.001). The diameter of Schlemm's canal was smaller in patients with previous glaucoma surgery compared with patients without glaucoma surgery (98 +/- 20 mu m vs. 125 +/- 4 mu m; P<0.01). The mean distance between the angle and Schlemm's canal was found to be smaller in hyperopes than in myopes (281 vs. 335 mu m; P = 0.03). The location of the canal in black patients compared with white patients was found to be more posterior from the limbus (659 +/- 92 mu m vs. 624 +/- 73 mu m; P = 0.05). Similarly, canal location in patients with corneal thickness of more than 555 mu m was found to be more posterior to the limbus (702 vs. 625 mu m; P<0.01) compared with those with thinner corneas. Conclusions: When measured in vivo with ultrasound biomicroscopy, Schlemm's canal diameter was significantly smaller (121 mu m) than demonstrated in previous histopathologic studies.
引用
收藏
页码:916 / 920
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] AINSWORTH JR, 1990, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V31, P745
  • [2] Schlemm's canal and primary open angle glaucoma: Correlation between Schlemm's canal dimensions and outflow facility
    Allingham, RR
    deKater, AW
    Ethier, CR
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 1996, 62 (01) : 101 - 109
  • [3] Endothelia of Schlemm's canal and trabecular meshwork:: distinct molecular, functional, and anatomic features
    Alvarado, JA
    Betanzos, A
    Franse-Carman, L
    Chen, J
    González-Mariscal, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 286 (03): : C621 - C634
  • [4] Chatterjee S., 2006, REGRESSION ANAL EXAM, V4th, P53, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470055464.CH3
  • [5] HOFFMANN F, 1971, Ophthalmic Research, V2, P37
  • [6] Johnson DH, 2000, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V118, P1251
  • [7] MCMENAMIN PG, 1986, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V93, P194
  • [8] Schlemm's canal endothelia, lymphatic, or blood vasculature?
    Ramos, Renata F.
    Hoying, James B.
    Witte, Marlys H.
    Stamer, W. Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2007, 16 (04) : 391 - 405
  • [9] SAMPAOLESI R, 1977, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V16, P302