The educative effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout

被引:77
作者
Tolbert, CJ [1 ]
Smith, DA
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Kent, OH USA
[2] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
direct democracy; ballot initiatives; turnout; progressive reform; education; political awareness;
D O I
10.1177/1532673X04271904
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Scholars have begun examining what Progressive reformers called the educative effects of direct democracy, especially the effect ballot initiatives have on voter turnout. Research based on aggregate-level voter age population (VAP) turnout data indicates that ballot measures increase turnout in low-information midterm elections but not in presidential elections. We analyze the impact of ballot initiative use on voter turnout from 1980 through 2002 using voter eligible population (VEP) turnout rates. Cross-sectional time-series analysis reveals that (a) ballot initiatives increase turnout in midterm as well as presidential elections and (b) the turnout effect in midterm and especially presidential elections is considerably larger than previously thought. On average, turnout in presidential elections increases by 0.70% with each initiative on the ballot, whereas turnout in midterm elections increases by 1.7%, all else equal. Given the closeness of the Electoral College contests, it is possible that the mobilizing effects of statewide ballot questions could be the determining factor in future presidential elections.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 309
页数:27
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
ALLSWANG John., 2000, The Initiative and Referendum in California, 1898-1998
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1955, AGE REFORM BRYAN F D
[3]  
Barber B., 1984, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age
[4]  
BARNETT J, 1915, OPERATION INITIATIVE
[5]  
Barreto MA, 2004, PS-POLIT SCI POLIT, V37, P11
[6]  
BLUNT M, 2004, BALLOT ISSUES OFFICI
[7]   The effect of direct democracy on the size and diversity of state interest group populations [J].
Boehmke, FJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2002, 64 (03) :827-844
[8]   Evolution in state governance structures: Unintended consequences of state tax and expenditure limitations [J].
Bowler, S ;
Donovan, T .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2004, 57 (02) :189-196
[9]  
Bowler S, 2004, PS-POLIT SCI POLIT, V37, P7
[10]   Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government [J].
Bowler, S ;
Donovan, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 32 :371-390