An experimental investigation of the electron energy dependence of the EPR alanine dosimetry system

被引:14
作者
Bergstrand, ES
Bjerke, H
Hole, EO
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Phys, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Radiat Protect Author, NO-1332 Osteras, Norway
关键词
EPR dosimetry; dosimetry; alanine; electron beams; radiotherapy; energy dependence; weighted regression;
D O I
10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.05.010
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The dose-to-water response of the EPR alanine dosimetry system for various electron beams used in radiotherapy is studied. The EPR alanine dosimetry system is established for high-dose dosimetry, usually transfer dosimetry of Co-60 gamma-rays. However, for clinical applications, where radiation qualities other than Co-60 gamma-rays are used, the behavior of the alanine dosimeter response needs to be further investigated. In the present work, electron beams from a clinical linear accelerator of the type Varian Clinac 2100 were used. Alanine dosimeters were irradiated with doses between 16 and 54 Gy in a plastic sleeve at the depths of dose maximum in a water phantom with electron beams of nominal energies of 6, 9, 12, 16 and 20 MeV (corresponding beam quality indices R-50: 2.4, 3.4, 4.8, 6.5 and 8.2 cm(2)/g). For the electron beams, the dose-to-water was monitored using a plane-parallel ion chamber, while for the Co-60 gamma-rays, the dose was monitored using a cylindrical chamber that was calibrated with water calorimetry. The obtained alanine dose-to-water responses for electrons relative to Co-60 gamma-rays indicated a small deviation from unity. An average relative response of about 0.97 for the electron beam qualities is indicated from the data. Possible explanations for the small observed response reduction relative to Co-60 gamma-rays are discussed. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ALLISYROBERTS PJ, 2000, BIPM9912
[2]  
Berger MJ, 1999, ESTAR PSTAR ASTAR CO
[3]   An investigation of the photon energy dependence of the EPR alanine dosimetry system [J].
Bergstrand, ES ;
Shortt, KR ;
Ross, CK ;
Hole, EO .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (12) :1753-1771
[4]   Comparison of two methods of therapy level calibration at 60Co gamma beams [J].
Bjerke, H ;
Jarvinen, H ;
Grimbergen, TWM ;
Grindborg, JE ;
Chauvenet, B ;
Czap, L ;
Ennow, K ;
Moretti, C ;
Rocha, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (10) :2729-2740
[5]  
De Angelis C, 2000, APPL RADIAT ISOTOPES, V52, P1203, DOI 10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00072-5
[6]  
DEANGELIS C, 2002, INT C STAND COD PRAC
[7]  
HARDER D, 1965, BRECHNUNG ENERGIEDOS
[8]  
*IAEA, 2001, 398 IAEA
[9]  
*IAEA, 1997, 381 IAEA
[10]   Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks [J].
Marre, D ;
Ferreira, IH ;
Bridier, A ;
Björeland, A ;
Svensson, H ;
Dutreix, A ;
Chavaudra, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (12) :3657-3674