The empirical relationship between quality management and the speed of new product development

被引:21
作者
Sun, Hongyi [1 ]
Zhao, Yangyang [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Mfg Engn & Engn Management, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
new product development (NPD); concurrent engineering (CE); total quality management (TQM); continuous improvement (CI); value analysis (VA); quality function deployment (QFD); CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; DEVELOPMENT-PROJECTS; TIME; CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1080/14783361003606480
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Quality management philosophy and tools have been widely used to improve and control product quality. However, there is a lack of literature on the relationship between quality management and new product development (NPD). People even worry whether quality management may hinder new product development. This paper reports a study that aims to investigate the influence of quality management on the speed of NPD. The research is based on the survey data from 700 manufacturing companies in 20 countries. The research reveals that TQM, teamwork, value analysis (VA) and quality function deployment (QFD) are all positively correlated with the speed of NPD, which means quality management philosophy and tools have a positive influence on the speed of NPD. This implies that companies which have implemented TQM and other quality tools will have a better basis for implementing new NPD approaches like concurrent engineering (CE) and design for manufacturing and assembly. This is especially encouraging for those OEM (original equipment manufacturing) firms that would like to change from OEM to ODM/OBM (original design manufacturing/original brand manufacturing). OEM companies normally implement TQM but very little in NPD.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 361
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Abdul-Rahman Hamza., 1999, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V16, P591, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656719910268198
[2]  
Ali A., 2000, Marketing Letters, V11, P151, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1008142823872
[3]  
Augusto Cauchick Miguel P., 2007, TQM MAGAZINE, V19, P617, DOI [10.1108/09544780710828458, DOI 10.1108/09544780710828458]
[4]   Comparison of manufacturing performance of three team structures in semiconductor plants [J].
Bailey, DE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1998, 45 (01) :20-32
[5]   Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: A contextual framework [J].
Balachandra, R ;
Friar, JH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1997, 44 (03) :276-287
[6]  
BELLARY A, 1999, PORTL INT C MAN ENG, V1, P329
[7]  
BULLINGER HJ, 1995, CONCURRENT ENG SYSTE
[8]   Fostering Continuous Improvement within new product development processes [J].
Caffyn, S ;
Grantham, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2003, 26 (08) :843-856
[9]   BENCHMARKING THE FIRMS CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT [J].
COOPER, RG ;
KLEINSCHMIDT, EJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1995, 12 (05) :374-391
[10]  
Cooper RG, 1999, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V16, P115, DOI 10.1111/1540-5885.1620115