Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability

被引：314
作者：
Yuan, Baolong [1 ]
Cao, Xueyun [1 ]
机构：
[1] Cent South Univ Forestry & Technol, Sch Business, Changsha 410004, Peoples R China
来源：
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY | 2022年 / 68卷
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Corporate social responsibility; Green product innovation; Green process innovation; Green dynamic capability; PRODUCT INNOVATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ECO-INNOVATION; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; MANAGEMENT; CSR;
D O I：
10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101868
中图分类号：
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Green innovation is a key aspect for organizations to realize sustainable development strategy in emerging markets. Based on the stakeholder theory, resource-based view, and dynamic capabilities theory, this study introduces corporate social responsibility (CSR) and green dynamic capability to investigate the mechanisms driving corporate green innovation. The green innovation is classified into two different aspects such as green product innovation and green process innovation. By surveying 424 manufacturing companies in China and analyzing with linear regression, we find that: (1) CSR practice significantly promotes green product innovation and green process innovation. (2) Green dynamic capability significantly promotes green product innovation and green process innovation. (3) Green dynamic capability function as a mediator between CSR and green innovation. Based on dynamic capabilities, this study reveals the impact mechanism of CSR on green innovation, expands the dynamic capabilities theory, and provides new guidance to improve green innovation for Chinese manufacturing companies.
引用
收藏
页数：15
相关论文
共 138 条
[81]   Are fiscal policy incentives effective in stimulating firms' eco-product innovation? The moderating role of dynamic capabilities [J].
Long, Siying ;
Liao, Zhongju .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (07) :3095-3104
[82]   Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value [J].
Luo, Xueming ;
Bhattacharya, C. B. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2006, 70 (04) :1-18
[83]   Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation [J].
Luo, Xueming ;
Du, Shuili .
MARKETING LETTERS, 2015, 26 (04) :703-714
[84]   Impacts of heterogeneous green consumers on green innovation in electric vehicle and charging pile firms [J].
Lv, Hongjun ;
Li, Dongdong .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 28 :1216-1231
[85]   Environmental management and product innovation: The moderating role of the dynamic capability of small manufacturing firms [J].
Mahmud, Muaz ;
Soetanto, Danny ;
Jack, Sarah .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264
[86]   Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions [J].
Miles, Samantha .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 142 (03) :437-459
[87]   Microfoundations of companies' dynamic capabilities for environmentally sustainable innovation: Case study insights from high-tech innovation in science-based companies [J].
Mousavi, Seyedesmaeil ;
Bossink, Bart ;
van Vliet, Mario .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (02) :366-387
[88]   Can the social trust promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China [J].
Pan, Zicheng ;
Liu, Liang ;
Bai, Shuyuan ;
Ma, Qianting .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (37) :52157-52173
[89]   Corporate social responsibility, benchmarking, and organizational performance in the petroleum industry: A quality management perspective [J].
Parast, Mahour Mellat ;
Adams, Stephanie G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 139 (02) :447-458
[90]   CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OR CEO NARCISSISM? CSR MOTIVATIONS AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE [J].
Petrenko, Oleg V. ;
Aime, Federico ;
Ridge, Jason ;
Hill, Aaron .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (02) :262-279
45678910111213