Doctor of pharmacy student preferences for computer-based vs. paper-and-pencil testing in a, social and administrative pharmacy course

被引:4
作者
Franic, Duska M. [1 ]
Palmer, Russ [2 ]
Fulford, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Pharm, Clin & Adm Pharm, RC Wilson Bldg,250 W Green St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Coll Pharm, 250 W Greer St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Computer-based; COVID-19; Online; Paper-and-pencil; Testing; Social and administrative pharmacy; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cptl.2021.03.018
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction: The use of online learning and subsequent online testing has expanded rapidly in pharmacy programs across the United States. Numerous published studies have compared online learning with traditional methods in pharmacy. However, no such studies have been published in pharmacy. This study's objective is to compare first-professional year student preferences for computer-based vs. traditional paper-and-pencil testing for a required social and administrative pharmacy class. Methods: All students enrolled in the class were invited to complete one brief survey at the end of the semester to determine their testing prekrence. Results: Of the 138 first-professional year students completing the survey, 79% (109 of 138) preferred computer-based testing, 9% had no preference, 6% (8 of 138) preferred paper-and-pencil testing, and the remainder (8 of 138) stated it depended on what was being tested. Ninety-one percent of students did not perceive the testing method to impact their grades. Students preferred computer-based testing over traditional paper-and-pencil as a convenient testing method (mean 4.73 vs. 3.4, P < .001), providing immediate feedback (mean 4.87 vs. 1.91, P < .001), and as a more effective testing method (mean 4.57 vs. 3.96, P < .001). Conclusions: First-professional year students preferred computer-based over traditional paper-andpencil testing for a social and administrative science class, with the method of testing not perceived to impact grade. This finding is timely, given the recent required transitioning of all pharmacy classes and subsequent testing to an online format due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 825
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Alahmar AT, 2018, ONLINE J HLTH ALLIED, V17, P10
  • [2] Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment
    Boeve, Anja J.
    Meijer, Rob R.
    Albers, Casper J.
    Beetsma, Yta
    Bosker, Roel J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [3] Navigating the Unchartered Waters in the Time of COVID-19
    Brazeau, Gayle
    Romanelli, Frank
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 84 (03) : 8063
  • [4] Corbett A. T., 2001, CHI 2001 Conference Proceedings. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, P245, DOI 10.1145/365024.365111
  • [5] Ghaderi M., 2014, International Journal of Education Literacy Studies, V2, P36, DOI [DOI 10.7575/AIAC.IJELS.V.2N.4P.36, 10.7575/aiac.ijels, DOI 10.7575/AIAC.IJELS]
  • [6] Hancock B., 1998, Trent focus for research and development in primary health care: An introduction to qualitative research
  • [7] Attitudes of PharmD students toward web-based versus paper-based case studies on a cardiology clerkship
    Howard, PA
    Grauer, DW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 68 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [8] Jonassen, 2004, HDB RES ED COMMUNICA, P745, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00127-009-0052-2
  • [9] Feedback in Written Instruction: The Place of Response Certitude
    Kulhavy, Raymond W.
    Stock, William A.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1989, 1 (04) : 279 - 308
  • [10] Mayring P., 2000, FORUM QUALITATIVE SO, V1, DOI DOI 10.17169/FQS-1.2.1089