Hybrid models to improve the monthly river flow prediction: Integrating artificial intelligence and non-linear time series models

被引:100
作者
Fathian, Farshad [1 ]
Mehdizadeh, Saeid [2 ]
Sales, Ali Kozekalani [3 ]
Safari, Mir Jafar Sadegh [4 ]
机构
[1] Vali E Asr Univ Rafsanjan, Fac Agr, Dept Water Sci & Engn, POB 77188-97111, Rafsanjan, Iran
[2] Urmia Univ, Dept Water Engn, Orumiyeh, Iran
[3] Elm O Fan Univ, Coll Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Orumiyeh, Iran
[4] Yasar Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
ANN; MARS; RF; SETAR; GARCH; Monthly river flow; Canada; NEURAL-NETWORKS; REGRESSION; STREAMFLOW; FUZZY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.025
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Prediction of river flow as a fundamental source of hydrological information plays a crucial role in various fields of water projects. In this study, at first, the capabilities of two time series analysis approaches, namely self exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) and generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models, then three artificial intelligence approaches including artificial neural networks (ANN), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and random forests (RF) models were investigated to predict monthly river flow. For this purpose, monthly river flow data of Brantford and Galt stations on Grand River, Canada, for the period from October 1948 to September 2017 were used and their performances were evaluated based on various evaluation criteria. The SETAR model showed better performance than the GARCH one in prediction of river flows at the stations of study. Additionally, the stand-alone MARS and RF models performed slightly better than the ANN. Next, hybrid models were developed by coupling the used ANN, MARS, and RF models with SETAR and GARCH models as the non-linear time series models. The performance of various models presented in this study indicated that the new hybrid models demonstrated a much better performance compared with the stand-alone ones at both stations. Among the developed hybrid models, the RF-SETAR models generally had the best accuracy to improve the river flows modeling. As a result, it can be concluded that the presented methodology can be used to predict hydrological time series such as river flow with a high level of accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1213
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[41]  
Tong H., 1983, THRESHOLD MODELS NON
[42]   Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy) [J].
Trigila, Alessandro ;
Iadanza, Carla ;
Esposito, Carlo ;
Scarascia-Mugnozza, Gabriele .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2015, 249 :119-136
[43]  
Tsay RS, 2010, Analysis of financial time series, V543
[44]   Predicting monthly streamflow using data-driven models coupled with data-preprocessing techniques [J].
Wu, C. L. ;
Chau, K. W. ;
Li, Y. S. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
[45]   Stream-flow forecasting using extreme learning machines: A case study in a semi-arid region in Iraq [J].
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher ;
Jaafar, Othman ;
Deo, Ravinesh C. ;
Kisi, Ozgur ;
Adamowski, Jan ;
Quilty, John ;
El-Shafie, Ahmed .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 542 :603-614
[46]   RBFNN versus FFNN for daily river flow forecasting at Johor River, Malaysia [J].
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher ;
El-Shafie, Ahmed ;
Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin ;
Hameed, Mohammed ;
Mohtar, Wan Hanna Melini Wan ;
Hussain, Aini .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2016, 27 (06) :1533-1542
[47]   EC-SVM approach for real-time hydrologic forecasting [J].
Yu, XY ;
Liong, SY ;
Babovic, V .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2004, 6 (03) :209-223
[48]   CEREF: A hybrid data-driven model for forecasting annual streamflow from a socio-hydrological system [J].
Zhang, Hongbo ;
Singh, Vijay P. ;
Wang, Bin ;
Yu, Yinghao .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 540 :246-256