Implementation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy in Routine Care: Opportunities and Challenges in the United States

被引:14
作者
Hehakaya, Charisma [1 ]
Sharma, Ankur M. [2 ,3 ]
Zijp, Jochem R. N. van der Voort Van [1 ]
Grobbee, Diederick E. [4 ,5 ]
Verkooijen, Helena M. [1 ,4 ]
Izaguirre, Enrique W. [2 ]
Moors, Ellen H. M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Div Imaging & Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Tennessee Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Innovat Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ONCOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; INNOVATIONS; PROMISES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2022.100953
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided radiation therapy with the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac) is a rapidly evolving and emerging treatment. The MR-Linac literature mainly focused on clinical and technological factors in technology implementation, but it is relatively silent on health care system-related factors. Consequently, there is a lack of understanding of opportunities and barriers in implementing the MR-Linac from a health care system perspective. This study addresses this gap with a case study of the US health care system. Methods and Materials: An exploratory, qualitative research design was used. Data collection consisted of 23 semistructured interviews ranging from clinical experts at the radiation therapy and radiology department to insurance commissioners in 7 US hospitals. Analysis of opportunities and barriers was guided by the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability framework for new medical technologies in health care organizations. Results: Opportunities included high-precision MR-guidance during radiation therapy with potential continued technical advances and better patient outcomes. MR-Linac also offers opportunities for research, professional, and economic development. Barriers included the lack of empirical evidence of clinical effectiveness, technological complexity, and large staffing and structural investments. Furthermore, the presence of patients with disadvantaged socioeconomic background, and the lack of appropriate reimbursement as well as regulatory conditions can hinder technology implementation. Conclusions: Our study confirms the current literature on implementing the MR-Linac, but also reveals additional challenges for the US health care system. Alongside the well-known clinical and technical factors, also professional, socioeconomic, market, and governing influences affect technology implementation. These findings highlight new connections to facilitate technology uptake and provide a richer start to understanding its long-term effect.(C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Expanding the Domains of Attitudes Towards Evidence-Based Practice: The Evidence Based Practice Attitude Scale-50 [J].
Aarons, Gregory A. ;
Cafri, Guy ;
Lugo, Lindsay ;
Sawitzky, Angelina .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (05) :331-340
[2]   How can we assess the value of complex medical innovations in practice? [J].
Abrishami, Payam ;
Boer, Albert ;
Horstman, Klasien .
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 15 (03) :369-371
[3]   Economic barriers to implementation of innovations in health care: Is the long run-short run efficiency discrepancy a paradox? [J].
Adang, Eddy M. M. ;
Wensing, Michel .
HEALTH POLICY, 2008, 88 (2-3) :236-242
[4]   The Impact of the Banking Competition in Funding and Lending Markets on Lending Technology [J].
Ahn, Jung-Hyun .
REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2016, 67 (06) :1117-1139
[5]  
Alongi F, 2020, 15T MR GUIDED DAILY, V94
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Social research methods, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
[7]   Expanding global access to radiotherapy [J].
Atun, Rifat ;
Jaffray, David A. ;
Barton, Michael B. ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Baumann, Michael ;
Vikram, Bhadrasain ;
Hanna, Timothy P. ;
Knaul, Felicia M. ;
Lievens, Yolande ;
Lui, Tracey Y. M. ;
Milosevic, Michael ;
O'Sullivan, Brian ;
Rodin, Danielle L. ;
Rosenblatt, Eduardo ;
Van Dyk, Jacob ;
Yap, Mei Ling ;
Zubizarreta, Eduardo ;
Gospodarowicz, Mary .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (10) :1153-1186
[8]   Implementation Research and Wraparound Literature: Building a Research Agenda [J].
Bertram, Rosalyn M. ;
Suter, Jesse C. ;
Bruns, Eric J. ;
O'Rourke, Koren E. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2011, 20 (06) :713-725
[9]  
Caccia-Bava Maria do Carmo, 2006, J Health Organ Manag, V20, P194, DOI 10.1108/14777260610662735
[10]   Evidence-based decision making: Global evidence, local decisions [J].
Clancy, CM ;
Cronin, K .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (01) :151-162