RETRACTED: Outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women in northeast England and in Norway, 1994-7 (Retracted Article. See vol 327, pg 905, 2003)

被引:26
作者
Hawthorne, G [1 ]
Irgens, LM
Lie, RT
机构
[1] No Diabet Pregnancy Survey, Reg Matern Survey Off, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AA, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Hauletend Hosp, Med Birth Registry Norway, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2000年 / 321卷 / 7263期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.321.7263.730
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In northeast England, perinatal mortality is five times higher and congenital malformation is four times higher for pregnancies in diabetic women than for those in women who do not have diabetes.' The same is true in other regions in the United Kingdom,(2 3) but this is not the case in Norway.(4) Why is the outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women better in Norway? Does Norway use the same definitions and record the same outcome data as the United Kingdom? If the data are standardised will these differences disappear! If not, what is causing the difference in the outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women? The methodology for data collection needs to be standardised between the two countries to determine whether differences in outcome are real before looking for explanations in the healthcare systems of the two countries. We compare the outcome of pregnancy in women with diabetes based on prospective population data collected in Norway and northeast England.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 731
页数:2
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, DIABETIC MED
[2]   Outcomes of pregnancy in insulin dependent diabetic women: results of a five year population cohort study [J].
Casson, IF ;
Clarke, CA ;
Howard, CV ;
McKendrick, O ;
Pennycook, S ;
Pharoah, POD ;
Platt, MJ ;
Stanisstreet, M ;
vanVelszen, D ;
Walkinshaw, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7103) :275-278
[3]  
HADDEN DR, 1998, DIABETIC MED S1, V15, pS16
[4]  
HAWTHORNE G, 1994, BRIT MED J, V315, P279
[5]  
Hellesen Harald Bjarne, 1996, Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, V116, P3465