Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers

被引:4
作者
Tri Huu Nguyen [1 ]
Thanh Nhu Dang [1 ]
Schnelldorfer, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hue Univ, Dept Digest Surg, Sch Med & Pharm, Hue City, Vietnam
[2] Lahey Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Burlington, MA USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Medford, MA 02155 USA
关键词
PEPTIC-ULCER; SIMPLE CLOSURE; OMENTAL PATCH; RISK-FACTORS; INCISION; SURGERY; APPENDECTOMY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-019-05352-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Laparoscopic single-port surgery has widely been introduced for the treatment of various abdominal conditions. But controversies still exist regarding its potential advantages and risks, especially for emergency surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of a single-port laparoscopic repair using straight laparoscopic instruments for the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Methods A prospective consecutive case series was conducted including all patients with a perforated duodenal ulcer who underwent a laparoscopic single-port repair at a single institution from January 2012 to June 2018. The operation was performed through a single port using conventional straight laparoscopic instruments and intra-corporeal knot tying techniques. Results Out of 75 patients, simple closure of the perforation without omental patch was accomplished in 96% of cases. Conversion to an open operation was required in one patient (1.3%) due to a posterior duodenal perforation, and additional trocar placement was needed in another patient (1.3%). The mean incision length was 2.0 +/- 0.2 cm. The mean operation time was 63.0 +/- 26.6 min. Meantime a nasogastric tube remained in place was 2.9 +/- 0.8 days. Mean duration of analgesic use was 2.8 +/- 0.8 days. The rate of postoperative complications was 2.7%, including two patients with wound infections. There were no instances of intestinal leak or abscess. The postoperative hospital stay was 5.7 +/- 1.2 days. Conclusion Laparoscopic single-port repair using conventional straight laparoscopic instruments with intra-corporeal knot tying technique was safe and feasible for patients with perforated duodenal ulcers with low risk factors. This method offers results comparable to those expected with the standard multiport laparoscopic approach with the addition of improved cosmetic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1425 / 1430
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: Patch versus simple closure
    Abd Ellatif, M. E.
    Salama, A. F.
    Elezaby, A. F.
    El-Kaffas, H. F.
    Hassan, A.
    Magdy, A.
    Abdallah, E.
    El-Morsy, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 11 (09) : 948 - 951
  • [2] Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aly, Omar E.
    Black, Douglas H.
    Rehman, Haroon
    Ahmed, Irfan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 35 : 120 - 128
  • [3] Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models - Are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study
    Anbalakan, K.
    Chua, D.
    Pandya, G. J.
    Shelat, V. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 14 : 38 - 44
  • [4] Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair
    Ates, Mustafa
    Sevil, Sedat
    Bakircioglu, Erhan
    Colak, Cemil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 17 (05): : 615 - 619
  • [5] Comparison of Cosmetic Outcome Between Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Rural Indian Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Borle, Firoz R.
    Mehra, Bhupendra
    Singh, Akash Ranjan
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S877 - S880
  • [6] Changing patterns in the surgical treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer - single centre experience
    Budzynski, Piotr
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Grzesiak-Kuik, Agata
    Natkaniec, Michal
    Major, Piotr
    Matlok, Maciej
    Stanek, Maciej
    Wierdak, Mateusz
    Migaczewski, Marcin
    Pisarska, Magdalena
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    [J]. VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2015, 10 (03) : 430 - 436
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis
    Byrge, Nickolas
    Barton, Richard G.
    Enniss, Toby M.
    Nirula, Raminder
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 206 (06) : 957 - 962
  • [8] Randomized Prospective Study to Compare Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Umbilical Single-Incision Appendectomy
    Dolores Frutos, Ma
    Abrisqueta, Jesus
    Juan Lujan
    Abellan, Israel
    Parrilla, Pascual
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (03) : 413 - 418
  • [9] Downes RO, 2016, J U SURG, V4, P1
  • [10] Evans L, 2016, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V26, P177, DOI 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000261