On the relative contributions of bias and noise to lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation errors

被引:25
作者
Mendoza, Sergio [1 ]
Liu, Ji [1 ]
Mishra, Partha [1 ]
Fathy, Hosam [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech & Nucl Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Experimental validation; SOC estimation error; SOC-OCV curve; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; PACKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2017.01.006
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This article examines the problem of quantifying lithium-ion battery state of charge (SOC) estimation errors. The article is motivated by the need for accurate SOC estimation in battery management and diagnostics applications. Given a statistical ensemble of SOC estimation experiments, one can classify these experiments' estimation errors into an average bias plus estimation noise. Previous theoretical work by the authors quantifies both of these error types, and suggests that in the presence of reasonable voltage and current measurement uncertainties, bias effects are likely to dominate compared to noise. The main goal of this article is to extend this theoretical finding to a higher-order battery model, and furthermore validate it experimentally. In particular, the article shows experimentally that the SOC estimation errors for a LiFePO4 battery are much closer in magnitude to the SOC estimation bias predicted by our theoretical analyses. This is important not only because it furnishes an experimentallysupported analytic characterization of lithium-ion battery SOC estimation accuracy, but also because it contrasts to previous studies in the literature where SOC estimation accuracy is evaluated using the Crame ' r-Rao theorem, which assumes unbiased estimation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 7 INT C WICOM
[2]   State-of-Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Neural Networks and EKF [J].
Charkhgard, Mohammad ;
Farrokhi, Mohammad .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2010, 57 (12) :4178-4187
[3]  
Di Domenico D., 2010, J DYN SYST MEAS CONT, V132
[4]   State of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries: An adaptive approach [J].
Fang, Huazhen ;
Wang, Yebin ;
Sahinoglu, Zafer ;
Wada, Toshihiro ;
Hara, Satoshi .
CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2014, 25 :45-54
[5]  
Gao M., 2011, PREOCEEEINGS 2011 4, P2233, DOI [10.1109/CISP.2011.6100603, DOI 10.1109/CISP.2011.6100603]
[6]   QUANTIFYING THE ERROR IN ESTIMATED TRANSFER-FUNCTIONS WITH APPLICATION TO MODEL ORDER SELECTION [J].
GOODWIN, GC ;
GEVERS, M ;
NINNESS, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1992, 37 (07) :913-928
[7]   A comparative study of equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries [J].
Hu, Xiaosong ;
Li, Shengbo ;
Peng, Huei .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2012, 198 :359-367
[8]   Estimation of State of Charge of a Lithium-Ion Battery Pack for Electric Vehicles Using an Adaptive Luenberger Observer [J].
Hu, Xiaosong ;
Sun, Fengchun ;
Zou, Yuan .
ENERGIES, 2010, 3 (09) :1586-1603
[9]   Analytic Bound on Accuracy of Battery State and Parameter Estimation [J].
Lin, Xinfan ;
Stefanopoulou, Anna G. .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 162 (09) :A1879-A1891
[10]  
Liu J., 2015, J DYNAMIC SYSTEMS ME, V138